2024 Statistics!

When Andy Williams sang “it’s the most wonderful time of the year”, he was on about Christmastime; but ’round these parts, the real most wonderful time of the year comes a little later: in early January, with the annual statistics post. And, friends, that time is here again.

Before the onslaught of numbers and graphs begin, a couple of quick reminders. Primarily: these stats cover my first-time feature film watches from 2024, as listed here. Shorts and rewatches are only factored in when expressly mentioned.

Secondly, and finally: as a Letterboxd Patron member, I get a yearly stats page there too, which can be found here. The numbers will look a bit different, because I also log whatever TV I can, plus it factors in shorts and rewatches more thoroughly, but that’s part of what makes it interesting as an addition/alternative to this post. It also breaks down some interesting things not covered here, like my most-watched and highest-rated stars and directors.

Now, without further ado, here’s what you came for…


I watched 131 feature films for the first time in 2024. That puts it right in the middle of the history of 100 Films: out of 18 years, it ranks ninth largest (or tenth smallest).

Of those 131 films, 85 counted towards my 100 Films in a Year Challenge. Alongside 15 rewatches, that means I finally reached all 100 films for my Challenge for the first time in its new form. More thoughts about that in the Final Standing and December review posts.

Outside of the Challenge, I rewatched only two further films for a total of 17 rewatches. That’s my lowest number since 2016, which was the last year before I started to make a concerted effort to up my rewatches (first with the Rewatchathon from 2017 to 2020, then by including them as a category in my Challenge). Any number going down is a shame, but there are always going to be compromises somewhere — if I’d rewatched more, I likely would’ve watched fewer new films.


NB: I have no rewatch data for 2007 and only incomplete numbers for 2008.

Here’s how that viewing played out across the year, month by month. The dark blue line is my first-time watches and the pale blue is rewatches. Both lines are much flatter than normal (I mean, look at 2023’s), which is because I was consistently hitting my “ten films per month minimum” goal but rarely managing to exceed it (the spikes in April and December being notable exceptions).

I also watched 16 short films. That might not sound like a lot, but it’s actually my third highest total ever, behind only 2019’s 20 and 2020’s 65 (which was so high thanks to watching many for film festivals I was working on), and just ahead of last year’s 15. On the other hand, only 11 were ones I’d never seen before, down marginally from 12 last year. (For some reason I didn’t make that distinction in last year’s stats, but it does affect the total running time, because only the new ones count.)

The total running time of my first-watch features was 229 hours and 3 minutes. That’s my highest since I revamped the site for 2022, but only ninth overall. The same ranking as for the film count? It’s almost as if there’s a correlation! I jest, but what it does suggest is that I rarely, if ever, watch a disproportionate number of especially-short or especially-long films. Talking of short things, add in the (new) short films and that total rises by only just over an hour to 230 hours and 14 minutes. (The additional bit is labelled as “other” on the graph because it would also include any alternate cuts of features that I watched for the first time, but there weren’t any this year. In fact, it’s been five years since there were.)

Formats next, and after disappearing last year, TV is back! Okay, it’s only got one film to its name (thanks to the BBC for premiering a new Wallace & Gromit feature on Christmas Day), but it’s something, I guess. Unless there’s another similar must-watch-live event in 2025 (doubtful), I imagine it will drop off again next year.

It will come as no surprise that the year’s most prolific viewing format was digital with 85 films. At 64.9% of my viewing, it’s an increase on last year, though still below the peak of 2020–2022. It was below 50% in 2019, and I’d like to get it back down there in favour of Blu-rays.

“Digital” encompasses a multitude of different platforms and viewing methods, and this year it was downloads that topped them with 20 films (23.5% of digital). Of the streamers, it was actually NOW that emerged victorious for the first time, with 18 films (21.2%), knocking Netflix and Amazon Prime into shared third place with 16 films (18.8%) each. Surging slightly ahead of the “also ran”s, iPlayer accounted for eight films (9.4%), while bringing up the rear were Apple TV+ on three (3.5), Disney+ and MUBI each on two (2.4%), and newcomer Crunchyroll with one (1.2%). Crunchyroll is all about TV and has hardly any films (I think I found a grand total of four), so don’t expect to see them return (although it’s not an impossibility).

Back to the main ranking, Blu-ray did come second with 38 films (29.0%), a raise in number but drop in percentage from last year.

Last year I noted that the addition of a Physical Media category to my Challenge hadn’t actually done much to boost the number of DVDs I watched. This year I took that category away, and DVD did drop slightly, down to six (4.6%); but, considered over a longer timescale, it’s held pretty steady — just look at the graph:

Finally, I made just one trip to the cinema this year (for Dune: Part Two). Other things piqued my interest, but nothing else panned out. Will 2025 fare any better? Well, I’ll be sure to catch the next Mission: Impossible, at least. Hey, one is still better than I managed some years (2013, 2014, and 2022, I’m looking at you).

Looking at formats from a different angle, now. First: in 2024, I watched as many new films in 3D as I did in 2021–2023 combined. Okay, that was still only four, but it’s an improvement. Looking at my Blu-ray collection, I own 63 films in 3D that I’ve never seen (plus about the same again that I’ve seen but not in 3D), so this number should be significantly higher. Maybe I’ll finally boost it up in 2025. (The first number to beat is 2020’s 13. The best ever is 2018’s 18.)

Next, the format du jour, 4K Ultra HD (it still feels pretty new to me, though 4K discs are about to hit their 9th anniversary). I watched 32 films in UHD in 2024, which is a numerical increase from 2023’s 27, but a percentage drop: 24.4% vs last year’s 26.2%. Still, it’s my second best percentage ever, so that’s not nothing. 1080p HD remains the standard, of course, representing a sliver under two-thirds of my viewing at 66.4%. Meanwhile, SD lingers on with 12 films — a hold from last year, but a percentage drop to 9.2%, only the second year it’s been under 10%. Will it ever go away entirely? It would be nice, but there remain plenty of films without even a DVD-quality SD copy out there, never mind all the DVDs that have never received an HD release.

Some people would think that the fact I’m watching so many films in high quality means I’m mostly watching new stuff, but those people are misinformed. Okay, so the the 2020s remains my top decade with 51 films (38.9%), its highest total yet; but other recent decades fare less well, with the 2000s and the 2010s in joint fifth with just eight films (6.1%) each. That’s the third year in a row that my top two decades haven’t been the most recent two; before that, it only happened in 2010 (understandably) and 2019.

The decade that actually landed second place was the 1980s with 17 films (12.98%), closely followed by the ’60s on 16 (12.2%), while the ’90s took fourth with on nine (6.9%). After the first two decades of this century, we come to another tie: the ’40s and the ’50s on seven (5.3%) each. Things are rounded out by the ’70s on six (4.6%) and the ’30s on two (1.5%). No features from before 1932 this year, although I did watch two shorts from the 1920s, five from the 1900s, and even one from the 1890s.

You might think no films from before 1932 would mean no silent films, but there was actually one. At this point I think we’re all aware they still make technically-silent films sometimes, and this year the qualifier was Robot Dreams. I still need to watch more genuine silents from the actual era though, and (minor spoiler alert!) some are almost guaranteed to feature in 2025.

As for spoken languages, English dominated as always, with 102 films wholly or significantly in my mother tongue. At 77.9%, it’s a couple of points up on last year, but still below any previous year. Nonetheless, second place is a distant tie between French and Cantonese in seven films (5.3%) each. They’re closely followed by Japanese in six (4.6%), Italian in five (3.8%), Mandarin and Spanish each in four (3.1%) each, and German and Persian in three (2.3%) apiece. In total, 19 languages were spoken in 2024’s viewing, including Czech and Telugu for the first time on record, and Swedish for the first time since 2020. That tally is better than 2022 or 2023, but still below 2015–2021.

In terms of countries of production, the USA drops below 50% for the first time ever, its 64 films accounting for just 48.85%. Meanwhile, the UK reaches a new percentage high, with 43 films coming out at 32.8%. Lest you think I’m going to brag about being worldly, I’ll note that only 29.0% of films didn’t feature either the US or UK among their listed production countries. Still, there were 31 countries in total in 2024, which is among the better years since I started recording this stat (the highest is 2020’s 40). France were third for the fourth year in a row with 17 films (12.98%), followed by Japan with 11 (8.4%), Hong Kong with nine (6.9%), Italy with eight (6.1%), then a three-way tie between Australia, Canada, and Germany each with five (3.8%).

A total of 114 directors plus eight directing partnerships helmed the feature films I watched in 2024, with a further six directors and four partnerships behind my short film viewing. For the second year in a row, no one was responsible for more than two features, but those with a duo on the list were Abbas Kiarostami, Denis Villeneuve, Joseph Kuo, Joseph L. Mankiewicz, Oliver Parker (not to be confused with Ol Parker, who also had one), Robert Tronson, Sammo Hung, W.S. Van Dyke, and Wellson Chin. Plus I watched three shorts credited to British cinema pioneer Cecil Hepworth.

This is my tenth year charting the number of female directors whose work I’ve watched each year. I’d love to say the number and percentage of women-directed films I watch has steadily grown in that time, but it’s actually fluctuated wildly. The low point was 2016, at just 1.66%; the high was 2020, at a still-measly 11.4%; last year, it was 11.2%. In 2024, I watched 10 films with a female director, though two of those were a shared credit (one as part of a duo, one a trio). Counting those shared credits as the appropriate fractions means those 10 films represent 6.74% of my viewing. As terrible as that sounds, it’s still my third best year — so, even worse, then. As I’ve said before, I neither avoid nor especially seek out female directors — arguably I should do more of the latter, but the fact I just watch what I watch and this is how low the percentage is suggests that it’s the industry who really need to do more. That said, as revealed earlier, I watch a relatively high percentage of older films, and you can’t change the past. I hope this graph will improve further in the future, but I doubt it will ever come close to 50/50.

Every year, I track my progress at completing the IMDb Top 250, but this year it’s a bit special because I made it a whole category in my 2024 Challenge. When I made that decision, it wasn’t guaranteed I’d finish the Top 250: the category only required 12 films to complete it and I had a few more than that left on the list. My thinking was: at the very least it will be significant progress; at best, maybe I’d watch a couple more than the prescribed 12 and get the list close to done. Well, I didn’t specifically watch any ‘extra’ films, but titles do come and go (Godzilla Minus One was on the list when I announced my plans in January, but was gone by the time I watched it in September) so maaaybe… but no, I’m still 10 films away from completing it. Goddammit. Comings and goings aside, at the time of writing this article there were 13 films from my 2024 viewing still on the Top 250 — the 12 I watched for the Challenge (listed here) plus Dune: Part Two. Their current positions range from 41st (Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse) to 237th (My Father and My Son). Well, there’s always next year…

As I’m sure you’re aware, at the end of every year I publish a list of 50 notable films I missed from that year’s new releases, which I call my “50 Unseen”. I’ve tracked my progress at watching those ‘misses’ down the years — progress that has been very variable: I didn’t watch too many of them at the start, then went through a period of several years where I made serious inroads, but recently I’ve dropped off again. Put in more practical terms: I hit a high of 68 watched from all previous lists during 2018, but only watched 10 during 2023. There’s a nice bounce in 2024, doubling to 20 films across all 17 lists, although it’s still one of my weaker years (only four were worse). That’s dominated by 12 from 2023’s 50 — a big improvement on the six from 2022 I watched last year, but still my fourth-worst ‘first year’ (historically, I’ve watched the most from any given list in its first year of existence).

In total, I’ve now seen 543 out of 850 ‘missed’ movies. That’s 63.9%, a further drop from last year, though still a little above 2017 (2018 was the first year I got it above 70%). I’d like to get it above 70% again, but to do it by the end of 2025 I’d have to watch 87 films, which is almost double the number I watched in 2022 to 2024 combined. To even hold the percentage steady I’d have to watch 32 films, which is still more than 2023 and 2024 combined, so it’s not looking great. (As usual, 2024’s 50 will be listed in my “best of” post.)

And so we reach the finale of every review; a fitting climax to these statistics: the scores.

For the avoidance of doubt, this stat factors in every new film I watched in 2024, including those I’ve not yet reviewed (this year, that’s 92% of them — an improvement on last year’s 95%, albeit not by much). That does mean there are some where I’m still flexible on my final score; usually films I’ve awarded 3.5 or 4.5 on Letterboxd, but which I insist on rounding to a whole star here. For the sake of completing these stats, I’ve assigned a whole-star rating to every film, but I reserve the right to change my mind when I eventually post a review (it’s happened before). It only applies to a small handful of films, so hopefully this section will remain broadly accurate.

At the top end of the scale, in 2024 I awarded 13 five-star ratings (9.92% of my viewing). That’s down slightly from last year, though not close to as low as 2022. (I’d make comparisons to all other years, but that’s only down fairly as a percentage and I don’t have that to hand. I should compile a list of them, really.) At the scale’s other end, I gave two one-star ratings (1.53%), which is more or less normal for me — indeed, my all-time average is 1.94 per year. Even when I watch more films, it doesn’t change much, because I avoid giving it to all but the most terrible rubbish, and I try to avoid watching such things, on the whole.

The largest group this year was four-stars, given to 56 films (42.75%). Three-stars has only been the majority awarded once (in 2012), but it came pretty close this year, as there were 52 three-star films (39.69%). Finally, there were only eight two-star films (6.11%), which is roughly in-keeping with the last couple of years (before that there were a lot more, but then I watched a lot more in general. I really ought to get those percentages ready for comparison…)

And so to the big final number: the average score for 2024. Oo-ooh! The short version is 3.5 out of 5 — down from last year, but the same as the two years before that. To get more precise (for the sake of comparison, as all of my years fall within a spread of 0.4), at three decimal places the score is 3.534 — that’s above 2021 and 2022, then, but the only other year it bests is 2012 (a real outlier, as you can see on the below chart). As my fourth lowest-scoring year, it’s almost the antithesis to last year, which was fifth highest.

What can we conclude from all that? Nothing much, really. The fact that line is pretty flat (a few oddities aside) suggests both my film choosing and my scoring have remained consistent over the years, for good or ill. Should I choose better films? Should I score more leniently? Or more harshly? To be honest, I don’t really think about such questions. I take these stats as an indication of what’s happened, not as a learning exercise in what I should or shouldn’t change.


Talking of scores and finales, next up is the finale of the 2024 review: my pick of the best from my 131 first-time watches.

December’s Failures

Welcome to my monthly “Failures” column, where I look back at some of the films I could, would, maybe even should have watched last month… but failed to.

On the big screen, Sony’s latest attempt at making a Spider-Man spin-off, Kraven the Hunter finally arrived almost two years after its first announced release date, and seemed to be received about as well as you’d expect for a Sony Spider-Man spin-off that had a two-year delay (i.e. poorly). In similar desperate franchise moves, animation The Lord of the Rings: The War of the Rohirrim seemed to generate more column inches because they admitted it was rushed out to secure the ongoing Rings film rights, rather than anyone saying anything about the film itself. I feel like Disney’s Mufasa: The Lion King, a “live-action” prequel that no one asked for, must fall into a similar bracket.

Conversely, I’ve read Sonic the Hedgehog 3 is good; the crazy idea of making a Robbie Williams biopic starring a CG monkey seems to have actually paid off in Better Man; and I keep hearing how good Daniel Craig is in Queer. Various other films managed theatrical releases of various other sizes, of course, but the one that most intrigues me is Shakespeare / video game mashup documentary Grand Theft Hamlet, which I believe is coming to MUBI sometime early in 2025, so I’ll look out for it then.

Over on streaming, various attempts at creating a Christmas classic seem to have been overshadowed by Carry-On — not a modern revamp of the old British comedy series, but an airport-based thriller starring Taron Egerton. I’d probably have watched it if I had a Netflix subscription (there’s a few things on there I need to catch up on now, so maybe it’s time I signed up again). As for the aforementioned seasonal fare, Netflix had the Richard Curtis written and produced animation That Christmas, plus 15-rated “birth of Jesus” movie Mary starring Anthony Hopkins as Herod (that’s literally all I know about it. I’ve not seen anyone discuss or review it. Is it actually real?); Sky Cinema and their fateful Original brand tried public-domain-IP mashup The Night Before Christmas in Wonderland; and Amazon had the streaming debut of (briefly theatrically released) wannabe-blockbuster Red One — which apparently was a huge hit for them, even after it flopped on the big screen, thus proving once again that the best way to ensure a streaming success is to have a wide theatrical release first.

Meanwhile, Disney+ had… fuck all. You’d’ve expected them to trot out something seasonal, right? But I don’t think they even had a premiere that was, er, non-seasonal. Even Apple TV+ spat out Fly Me to the Moon, the Channing Tatum/Scarlett Johansson Nasa-during-the-space-race romcom with posters that made it look like a fake movie-in-a-movie. But Disney+ never have anything much new anymore in the way of original movies, it seems to me (just their high-profile theatrical releases making relatively-speedy debuts). Has the Mouse already got wise to the false promises of streaming originals? Let’s hope others follow suit.

In the second tier of films making their streaming debuts, basketball anime The First Slam Dunk came to Netflix. Sports movies aren’t normally my bag, but I’ve seen this on various “great films” lists (especially animated ones) for what feels like years, so here’s a chance to… be reminded to watch the other copy I, ahem, got hold of fairly recently. Indeed, Netflix seemed to specialise in things I already own but haven’t watched, which is always irritating. Other titles included Marcel the Shell with Shoes On, Puss in Boots: The Last Wish, Scream VI, and Knock at the Cabin, which has already been on NOW so I’m doubly miffed at myself. NOW themselves pulled the same trick with Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire, plus Abigail, Kung Fu Panda 4, and A Quiet Place: Day One. And at the more… esoteric end of the spectrum, MUBI had a new version of an old film in Caligula: The Ultimate Cut, and a film they self-described as Andrea Arnold’s “long-awaited return to fiction filmmaking”, Bird.

The ever-changing streaming back catalogue is a beast of greater size than even Santa’s bulging sack, but a selection of titles of particular interest included Killer Joe, Mississippi Grind, The Reader, Warm Bodies, and the return of streaming perennial The Notebook (all on Amazon); Bodies Bodies Bodies, I, Tonya, King Richard, and Stan & Ollie, and the original Point Break, which I’ve been meaning to rewatch (all on iPlayer); and Brian and Charles, I’m Your Man, Petite Maman, A Quiet Place Part II, Spencer, and The Worst Person in the World (all on Channel 4). There were also various other Christmas-related movies, like The Holiday (which has somehow transformed into a modern classic in recent years) and various versions of The Grinch, none of which I’m going to watch in January because it’s not Christmas anymore. Maybe next year.

The above paragraph doesn’t even touch on all the films that arrived on streamers this month but I already own on disc and haven’t watched, acting as a reminder of the slight ludicrousness of my physical media collection. A soupçon of particularly daft ones (read: I’ve owned them for so long, why haven’t I watched them?) includes on Howard’s The Missing, Guy Ritchie’s Revolver, and Alfonso Cuarón’s Y Tu Mamá También on Netflix (I own all of those on DVD. Why would I watch a DVD when they’re streaming in HD? Besides, for all I know they could have disc rot or something by now); Baz Luhrmann’s The Great Gatsby, Billy Wilder’s The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes, and Ben Affleck’s The Town on Prime; Terry Gilliam’s The Brothers Grimm, Sergio Leone’s A Fistful of Dynamite, and Alex Cox’s Repo Man on NOW; Nicolas Roeg’s Don’t Look Now, trilogy-completing How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World, and John Frankenheimer’s The Train on iPlayer; and Brian De Palma’s Carlito’s Way, Robert Eggers’s The Northman, and M Night Shyamalan’s Old on Channel 4. And that’s without even starting on stuff to rewatch.

In the face of such overwhelming evidence that I don’t watch enough of what I buy, I naturally went ahead and bought even more. Now, of course I’m going to buy something like Alien: Romulus, because I own all the others and I’m a completist. I’m not sure the same logic really applies to Joker: Folie à Deux (I stopped buying all the DC movies a while ago), but there we go, I bought it anyway. And I couldn’t resist a classic like Galaxy Quest making its 4K debut, especially when it comes with all the correct aspect ratios for the first time on home media. As for most of the rest of my purchases…

You know what, they’re not the sort of thing that usually turns up on streaming, so I feel a lot less bad about those. I’m talking the kind of stuff put out by Radiance: their Luis Buñuel box set, Nothing Is Sacred, containing Viridiana, The Exterminating Angels, and Simon of the Desert; Swedish crime thriller The Man from Majorca; and Japanese neo-noir Yokohama BJ Blues. I’m talking various labels’ commitment to getting loads of classic Hong Kong action on disc, which this month was represented by Eureka’s wittily-titled four-film set of historical epics directed by the prolific Chang Cheh, Horrible History, containing Marco Polo, The Pirate, Boxer Rebellion, and Four Riders. I’m talking stuff you can only get if you import it from Australia, like the third volume in Imprint’s After Dark: Neo-Noir Cinema Collection, containing Homicide, White Sands, The Crossing Guard, Heaven’s Prisoners, Under Suspicion, and Dirty Pretty Things; plus a pre-Bond Roger Moore in Swinging Sixties thriller Crossplot, and sci-fi noir The Man in Half Moon Street.

I’m also talking about stuff like Studiocanal’s epic Hitchcock: The Beginning box set. Streamers infamously have very few movies from The Past (often only a small handful from before 1980, if any), so who’s going to offer ten Hitchcocks from the 1920s and ’30s? Especially when almost half of them are silent. (Studiocanal do have their own channel on Amazon Prime, but that doesn’t really count.) The set includes both silent and talkie versions of Blackmail, newly restored in 4K, supplemented by the brand-new feature-length documentary Becoming Hitchcock: The Legacy of Blackmail. The set also contains UK HD debuts for The Ring, The Farmer’s Wife, Champagne, The Manxman, Juno and the Paycock (which was scarcely even available on DVD, if I remember correctly), Murder!, its German-language variant Mary, The Skin Game, Rich and Strange, and Number Seventeen; plus a wealth of special features — and you definitely don’t get those on streamers.

Okay, maybe the line gets a little blurrier elsewhere. Masters of Cinema recently released animation The Secret of NIMH, which is mainstream enough you might expect to find it streaming (though, currently, it’s not); but then they also released the Kinji Fukasaku-directed Japanese answer to Star Wars, Message from Space, and where else are you likely to find that but on disc? (Whether it’s worthy of being a Masters of Cinema release is another matter.) Of course, sometimes streamers will surprise you. Which one out of time-bending actioner Run Lola Run, East-meets-West Western Red Sun, and Ealing Comedy Kind Hearts and Coronets do you think is currently on a streamer? (It’s the Western.) You can rent the other two, but that’s not quite what I’m talking about. And I’ll add this: I got all of those on 4K UHD, and only one of them is streaming in that format. I may spend a disproportionate amount on physical media, but it’s still the best.

2024: The List

As fun and interesting as they are, my Failures posts always takes a while to write each month (I fail to watch so much stuff, after all), which proves an extra challenge at the start of January, when I have so many other posts I’m working on for my annual review. So, while I continue to write that, here’s something else.

Throughout the year, my monthly reviews keep you up-to-date on my progress with the 100 Films in a Year Challenge; what they no longer record is all my first-time watches. Fortunately, to rectifying that omission we have The List: every film I watched for the first time in 2024, plus a couple of other bits at the end (see the section introduction for more on that).

But first, something else about the Challenge…


Here is a graphical representation of my viewing for the 100 Films in a Year Challenge, month by month, courtesy of the monthly review header images. Each one links to the relevant monthly review, which contain a chronological list of my Challenge viewing, as well as other fun stuff, like my monthly Arbie awards.


Here is an alphabetical list of all my first-time watches during 2024. That’s followed by a list of rewatches that have had (or for which I intend to write) ‘Guide To’ posts, then short films I watched for the first time. On the rare occasion that a title is a link, it goes to my review (no link means no review yet).

  • 12th Fail (2023)
  • Adam and 6 Eves [3D] (1962)
  • The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert (1994)
  • Alice (1988), aka Něco z Alenky
  • Allelujah (2022)
  • Ambulancen (2005), aka Ambulance
  • American Fiction (2023)
  • And Life Goes On (1992), aka Zendegi va digar hich
  • Argylle (2024)
  • Army of Shadows (1969), aka L’armée des ombres
  • Attempt to Kill (1961)
  • Bad Tidings (2024)
  • Bank of Dave (2023)
  • Barbie (2023)
  • The Batman (2022)
  • The Best of the Martial Arts Films (1990)
  • The Best Years of Our Lives (1946)
  • Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F (2024)
  • The Birdcage (1996)
  • Black Tight Killers (1966), aka Ore ni sawaru to abunaize
  • Blitz (2024)
  • The Blood on Satan’s Claw (1971), aka Satan’s Skin
  • The Bookshop (2017)
  • Bottoms (2023)
  • Carol for Another Christmas (1964)
  • Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget (2023)
  • A Chorus Line (1985)
  • Clue of the Silver Key (1961)
  • The Cranes Are Flying (1957), aka Letyat zhuravli
  • Desperado (1995)
  • Despicable Me 3 [3D] (2017)
  • Dragons Forever (1988), aka Fei lung mang jeung
  • Dreadnaught (1981), aka Yong zhe wu ju
  • Duel to the Death (1983), aka Xian si jue
  • Dune: Part Two (2024)
  • Dungeons & Dragons: Honour Among Thieves (2023)
  • Encounter of the Spooky Kind (1980), aka Gui da gui
  • Eyeball (1975), aka Gatti rossi in un labirinto di vetro
  • The Fall Guy (2024)
  • Fast X (2023)
  • Flashdance (1983)
  • Fletch (1985)
  • Four Flies on Grey Velvet (1971), aka 4 mosche di velluto grigio
  • The Fourth Square (1961)
  • The French Lieutenant’s Woman (1981)
  • From Roger Moore with Love (2024)
  • Frozen II [3D] (2019)
  • Goblin Slayer: Goblin’s Crown (2020)
  • Godzilla Minus One (2023), aka Gojira -1.0
  • Golem (1980)
  • The Good, the Bad, the Weird (2008), aka Joeun nom, napun nom, esanghan nom
  • The Great Escaper (2023)
  • Guys and Dolls (1955)
  • Hellraiser (1987)
  • The Holdovers (2023)
  • Hopscotch (1980)
  • Host (2020)
  • Hotel Rwanda (2004)
  • I Love You Again (1940)
  • I.S.S. (2023)
  • An Ideal Husband (1999)
  • In the Name of the Father (1993)
  • Incendies (2010)
  • The Innocents (1961)
  • Inside Out 2 (2024)
  • The Inspector Wears Skirts (1988), aka Ba wang hua
  • The Inspector Wears Skirts Part II (1989), aka Shen yong fei hu ba wang hua
  • Jackass Forever (2022)
  • The Kitchen (2023)
  • Kung Fu Hustle (2004), aka Kung fu
  • Lee (2023)
  • Lift (2024)
  • Like Stars on Earth (2007), aka Taare Zameen Par
  • Look Back (2024), aka Rukku Bakku
  • Love Wedding Repeat (2020)
  • Lover Come Back (1961)
  • Maestro (2023)
  • Man at the Carlton Tower (1961)
  • Man Detained (1961)
  • Man in the Dark [3D] (1953)
  • Mazes and Monsters (1982)
  • The Menu (2022)
  • The Monuments Men (2014)
  • Mrs Palfrey at The Claremont (2005)
  • The Phantom of the Open (2021)
  • Murder and Cocktails (2024)
  • My Darling Clementine (1946)
  • My Father and My Son (2005), aka Babam ve Oglum
  • My Favorite Brunette (1947)
  • My Son (2021)
  • The Mystery of Chess Boxing (1979), aka Shuang ma lian huan
  • No Hard Feelings (2023)
  • October Moth (1960)
  • The Old Oak (2023)
  • Only Yesterday (1991), aka Omohide poro poro
  • Partie de Campagne (1946), aka A Day in the Country
  • Possession (1981)
  • The Prosecco Murders (2017), aka Finché c’è Prosecco c’è speranza
  • Rio Bravo (1959)
  • Road to Bali (1952)
  • Robot Dreams (2023)
  • Rosemary’s Baby (1968)
  • RRR (2022)
  • Save the Cinema (2022)
  • Scenes from a Marriage (1974), aka Scener ur ett äktenskap
  • Scooby-Doo! The Sword and the Scoob (2021)
  • A Separation (2011), aka Jodaeiye Nader az Simin
  • The Seventh Victim (1943)
  • Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse (2023)
  • The Steal (1995)
  • Strays (2023)
  • The Super Mario Bros. Movie (2023)
  • The Swordsman of All Swordsmen (1968), aka Yi dai jian wang
  • Tarzan the Ape Man (1932)
  • Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem (2023)
  • Ticket to Paradise (2022)
  • To Kill a Mockingbird (1962)
  • Triangle of Sadness (2022)
  • The Triumph of Sherlock Holmes (1935)
  • Le Trou (1960)
  • The Wages of Fear (1953), aka Le Salaire de la peur
  • Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl (2024)
  • When Eight Bells Toll (1971)
  • Where Is the Friend’s House? (1987), aka Khane-ye doust kodjast?
  • Wicked Little Letters (2023)
  • Wild Tales (2014), aka Relatos salvajes
  • Wolfs (2024)
  • Wonka (2023)
  • Yellow Canary (1943)
  • Yi Yi (2000)
  • Young at Heart (1954)
The 100 Films Guide To…
  • Cutthroat Island (1995)
Shorts
12th Fail

And Life Goes On

The Batman

A Chorus Line

Duel to the Death

Flashdance

Godzilla Minus One

Hellraiser

I Love You Again

Inside Out 2

Out of the Past

Man Detained

My Favorite Brunette

The Prosecco Murders

Robot Dreams

A Separation

Tarzan the Ape Man

When Eight Bells Toll

Wonka

Cutthroat Island

Steamboat Willie

.

My favourite part of the year: breaking all of the above down with statistics!

The Mission: Accomplished Monthly Review of December 2024

In my introduction to the 2024 edition of my 100 Films in a Year Challenge, I wondered if it would be “third time lucky” — having failed to complete the Challenge in 2022 and 2023, could I manage it in 2024? And the answer is: yes. Hurrah! Although it’s not really “luck”, but a mixture of dedication (sticking at it all year), tweaking (making changes year-on-year to keep the task challenging but make it achievable), and working out the best way to approach it (learning what didn’t work on my first two goes so I could avoid those mistakes).

I’ve felt a greater sense of achievement in completing the Challenge this year than I have for years. Partly that’s because I failed the last two years, so no achievement-feeling there; but also, the previous version of the Challenge had become de rigueur. Some years I completed it as early as May (four times out of fifteen, to be precise, so almost a third of the times I did it). Even if I didn’t manage that, completing it hadn’t been a problem since 2012 (which was the last time I failed — every success since then happened no later than November). It had become a sprint to the finish line, which wasn’t really what I wanted it to be — it was supposed to be a challenge, and it was supposed to take all year. That’s more or less why I decided to mix it up, and the fact I failed the new-style Challenge on my first two attempts shows I’d succeeded in making it trickier for myself. So, to manage it on my third go… I think it’s justified to feel a sense of achievement. Sure, it’s still only “watching films” — arguably one of the easiest, most passive hobbies you can have — but it’s something.

Anyway, there’ll be more reflection on the Challenge in its entirety in the days to come, when I trot out my usual array of year-end retrospectives. For now, let’s zoom in on the final stretch…



This month’s viewing towards my yearly challenge

#94 Look Back (2024) — Failure #12
#95 Hotel Rwanda (2004) — WDYMYHS #10
#96 The Holdovers (2023) — New Film #12
#97 To Kill a Mockingbird (1962) — WDYMYHS #11
#98 Le Trou (1960) — Blindspot #12
#99 Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse (2023) — WDYMYHS #12
#100 Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit (2005) — Rewatch #12


  • I watched 14 feature films I’d never seen before in December.
  • That means I’ve achieved at least 10 first-watches in every month of 2024 — the first whole calendar year I’ve managed that since 2020!
  • And 14 equals April for the most first-watches in a single month of 2024.
  • I haven’t been mentioning those kinds of stats much this year, because most months have been unremarkable. December’s done alright, though: it’s beaten the rolling average of the last 12 months (10.9); beaten the average for 2024 to date (previously 10.6, now 10.9 too, natch); and beaten the average for all Decembers (previously 11.6, now 11.8).
  • Back to my 100 Films in a Year Challenge: six of those first-watches counted towards my Challenge, along with one rewatch.
  • Normally I’d count the first 2024 film of a month as the New Film, because it’s a ‘higher’ category; and normally I’d be only too happy to keep the Failures slot open a little longer, because there’s always so many of them. But there are so many 2024 releases I’ve missed, it felt more productive to try to force myself to watch another one of them rather than another Failure.
  • This is the first time I’ve completed Blindspot in this new era — I was one shy in 2022 and three short in 2023. (I didn’t complete WDYMYHS in 2022 either, but did in 2023.)
  • I watched all six Wallace & Gromit films this month, but only one of them counted towards my Challenge. It was nearly none at all, but I didn’t get in the other rewatch I had planned, so Curse of the Were-Rabbit snagged that space. Shorts don’t currently count anyway (maybe one day), but Vengeance Most Fowl could’ve been here as a New Film, if there’d been any slots left.
  • This month’s concluding Blindspot film was French prison break thriller Le Trou.
  • This month’s WDYMYHS films represented a whole quarter of the list. They were genocide drama Hotel Rwanda, racism drama To Kill a Mockingbird, and superhero adventure Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse. Bit of a change of tone at the end there.
  • From last month’s “failures” I watched The Holdovers and Look Back.



The 115th Monthly Arbitrary Awards

Favourite Film of the Month
As I get started on my yearly review posts, I’m endeavouring to give everything a final score (for the stats) and starting to think about my top ten list. There are a few films this month that are in contention for the latter, and I’m still considering giving 5s for the former. One that feels like a lock for the list but maybe not for a 5 (because I enjoyed it a heck of a lot, but is it a 5-star film? Not sure yet) was The Good, the Bad, the Weird — recently released on 4K by Arrow, but I watched my old Blu-ray copy to decide if I wanted to buy that new version. Suffice to say, I did.

Least Favourite Film of the Month
I’m beginning to suspect 2024’s average score might be a strong one (but, hey, you never know) because this was another month with no truly bad films (a sentence I feel I’ve written a lot this year). That said, Hotel Rwanda struck me as a somewhat old-fashioned movie-ised treatment of a very real tragedy, which is a less than ideal reaction to something that should really be powerful.

The Audience Award for Most-Viewed New Post of the Month
Wordpress seem to have revised their stats presentation, making this harder to work out (they no longer highlight it for me — I have to look up every post one by one), which is a shame and makes me disinclined to continue this next year. But, for now, I can say the most-viewed post during December was the November monthly review — the fifth time the previous month’s review has won this award in 2024. It only beat the Failures by one hit, though.(For what its worth: of the other seven winners, it was the previous month’s failures twice, and a film review the other five times.)



Every review posted this month, including new titles and the Archive 5


It’s 2025 — a quarter of the way through the century! Jesus. Everything just conspires to make you feel old nowadays, doesn’t it?

As ever, before I get into the swing of the new year, I’ll be spending a good few posts looking back at the old one. After another mostly-quiet year here on 100 Films, it’s going to be a busy week (give or take).

100 Films in a Year Challenge 2024: Final Standing

As the challenge tracker page will soon be replaced with a version keeping tabs on 2025’s effort, here’s an archive of how it looked at the very end of 2024.

The most noteworthy thing: it’s complete! For the first time since I revamped my Challenge in 2022, I’ve actually managed to get all the way to 100.

I’ll write more about that in the days to come. For now, here are the films that got me there…


On this page, I’ll track my progress with The 100 Films in a Year Challenge 2024. Learn more about the challenge here.

New Films

  1. Lift (2024)
  2. The Kitchen (2023)
  3. Dune: Part Two (2024)
  4. I.S.S. (2023)
  5. Murder and Cocktails (2024)
  6. Argylle (2024)
  7. Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F (2024)
  8. Robot Dreams (2023)
  9. The Fall Guy (2024)
  10. Lee (2023)
  11. Inside Out 2 (2024)
  12. The Holdovers (2023)

Rewatches

  1. Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse [3D] (2018)
  2. Dune: Part One [3D] (2021)
  3. Spawn: Director’s Cut (1997/1998)
  4. Shadow of the Thin Man (1941)
  5. The Thin Man Goes Home (1945)
  6. Sleepless in Seattle (1993)
  7. Moana [3D] (2016)
  8. Hamilton (2020)
  9. Cutthroat Island (1995)
  10. Erin Brockovich (2000)
  11. First Knight (1995)
  12. Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit (2005)

Blindspot

  1. Only Yesterday (1991)
  2. The Innocents (1961)
  3. My Darling Clementine (1946)
  4. Where Is the Friend’s House? (1987)
  5. Yi Yi (2000)
  6. Army of Shadows (1969)
  7. Scenes from a Marriage (1974)
  8. Rio Bravo (1959)
  9. Rosemary’s Baby (1968)
  10. Possession (1981)
  11. The Cranes Are Flying (1957)
  12. Le Trou (1960)

What Do You Mean You Haven’t Seen…?

  1. In the Name of the Father (1993)
  2. Wild Tales (2014)
  3. My Father and My Son (2005)
  4. 12th Fail (2023)
  5. A Separation (2011)
  6. Like Stars on Earth (2007)
  7. The Best Years of Our Lives (1946)
  8. Incendies (2010)
  9. The Wages of Fear (1953)
  10. Hotel Rwanda (2004)
  11. To Kill a Mockingbird (1962)
  12. Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse (2023)

Failures

  1. Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget (2023)
  2. Ambulancen (2005)
  3. Black Tight Killers (1966)
  4. American Fiction (2023)
  5. Strays (2023)
  6. Four Flies on Grey Velvet (1971)
  7. Alice (1988)
  8. The Man from U.N.C.L.E. (2015)
  9. Desperado (1995)
  10. Host (2020)
  11. The Seventh Victim (1943)
  12. Look Back (2024)

50 Unseen

  1. Barbie (2023)
  2. Bottoms (2023)
  3. RRR (2022)
  4. Maestro (2023)
  5. The Monuments Men (2014)
  6. No Hard Feelings (2023)
  7. Dungeons & Dragons: Honour Among Thieves (2023)
  8. The Menu (2022)
  9. Fast X (2023)
  10. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem (2023)

Genre: Martial Arts

  1. The Best of the Martial Arts Films (1990)
  2. The Inspector Wears Skirts (1988)
  3. The Inspector Wears Skirts Part II (1989)
  4. The Mystery of Chess Boxing (1979)
  5. Kung Fu Hustle (2004)
  6. The Swordsman of All Swordsmen (1968)
  7. Encounter of the Spooky Kind (1980)
  8. Dreadnaught (1981)
  9. Duel to the Death (1983)
  10. Dragons Forever (1988)

Series Progression

  1. Jackass Forever (2022)
  2. Despicable Me 3 [3D] (2017)
  3. The Fourth Square (1961)
  4. And Life Goes On (1992)
  5. Song of the Thin Man (1947)
  6. October Moth (1960)
  7. Man at the Carlton Tower (1961)
  8. The Triumph of Sherlock Holmes (1935)
  9. Road to Bali (1952)
  10. Clue of the Silver Key (1961)

Wildcards

  1. The Super Mario Bros. Movie (2023) — additional Failure from March
  2. Wicked Little Letters (2023) — additional Failure from July
  3. Godzilla Minus One (2023) — additional 50 Unseen
  4. Frozen II (2019) — additional Series Progression
  5. The Batman (2022) — additional 50 Unseen
  6. Golem (1980) — additional Failure from August
  7. Attempt to Kill (1961) — additional Series Progression
  8. Man Detained (1961) — additional Series Progression
  9. The Guest (2014) — additional Rewatch in October
  10. Blitz (2024) — additional New Film in November

It’s almost time…

A belated Merry Christmas to you, dear readers — I hope you’ve had a good one, whatever you’ve been up to.

Me? I’ve been kept busy most of the month, first with wrapping up the year at the day job, then with family stuff across the holiday. It hasn’t left much time for the ol’ blog — plans to write a review of my year’s TV viewing, or promptly say something about the new Wallace & Gromit film, have fallen by the wayside. Such is life.

But as the new year approaches (2025! A quarter of the way through this century that I, at least, would still refer to as “new”), I’m once again preparing for my barrage of annual review posts. Lists! Rankings! Statistics! It’s all brewing; all on the way soon now. I have a slight suspicion it’s not going to roll out as quickly and smoothly as usual (it doesn’t help that the first weekend of 2025 is so early — the chances of having 2024 finished by January 5th seem slim), but I’ll do my best.

And then it will be on to 2025 proper. Plans are afoot for the fourth year of my new-style Challenge. But let’s not get ahead of ourselves, eh?

The Cranes Are Flying (1957)

aka Letyat zhuravli

Mikhail Kalatozov | 97 mins | Blu-ray | 1.37:1 | Soviet Union / Russian | 12

The Cranes Are Flying

The Russians seem to excel at making a certain kind of war movie; one that befits our stereotype of their national temperament. It might be most succinctly described as “grim as fuck”. The Cranes Are Flying is no Come and See in that regard, but it’s also a million miles away from the gung-ho, celebratory kind of World War II pictures being produced by the US and UK during the same era. No exciting commemorations of the heroic deeds of our brave boys here. Instead, this is a clear-eyed condemnation of the futility of sending the young off to war, and the devastation wreaked on those back at home.

Yet, for all of that, the film is underpinned by what feels like a broadly standard “wartime romance” storyline. Veronika (Tatiana Samoilova) and Boris (Aleksey Batalov) are young and in love, in that all-consuming do-or-die way only young people can be, when war is declared. He does some kind of important job so should be safe from the draft, but — spoiler alert! — he volunteers anyway. Will they survive the war so and be reunited? What other calamities will fate throw at them to prevent happiness? Yes, as if war weren’t enough, other Bad Shit goes down too. I suppose that’s part of what helps the film overcome what could have been a boilerplate plot: that it’s not just about Veronika pining away at home while Boris tries not to get killed on the front line. Indeed, the film is more focused on Veronika’s struggles than on Boris fighting the actual war, and it benefits immensely from a strong performance by Samoilova as Veronika navigates her own personal battles.

The war at home

Nonetheless, what really elevates and defines the film is the truly remarkable camerawork by cinematographer Sergey Urusevskiy. Appropriately, his then-groundbreaking use of handheld cameras was a filming technique he had learned as a military cameraman during the war. But its effectiveness goes far beyond the mere fact the camera isn’t mounted. ‘Handheld’ tends to conjure an idea of rough, on-the-fly, documentary-esque filmmaking, but that’s not the impression you get here. The shots are still carefully composed, it’s just that they’re also often extraordinarily and innovatively designed, in a way that remains striking seven decades later. The very way the camera moves is sometimes part of the storytelling itself; at others, it cleverly imparts new information mid-shot, or reveals the scale of events. As an inherently visual success, there’s little point in trying to describe it — “just watch it” has rarely been more apt. (That said, Chris Fujiwara’s essay for the Criterion Collection neatly describes several of the film’s most memorable shots.)

The Cranes Are Flying was a huge success on its release, both at home in the Soviet Union — where it was a breath of fresh air for a nation used to positive propaganda pictures — and abroad, becoming the first (and last) Soviet film to win the Palme d’Or. (For our part, it was nominated for two BAFTAs, although it won neither: it was one of several still-acclaimed movies that lost Best Film from Any Source to a British film (Room at the Top) that also won Best British Film (do I smell bias?), and Samoilova lost Best Foreign Actress to the lead from that same film (hmm…) Next time someone tries to claim awards have become meaningless, maybe suggest they always have been.) They also don’t really matter, this many years later, when we can easily appreciate this film’s successes — both for the impact it had at the time, and the one it continues to have today.

5 out of 5

The Cranes Are Flying is the 91st film in my 100 Films in a Year Challenge 2024. It was viewed as part of Blindspot 2024. It was my Favourite Film of the Month in November 2024.

November’s Failures

Welcome to my monthly “Failures” column, where I look back at some of the films I could, would, maybe even should have watched last month… but failed to.

Normally I start with what feels like the ‘biggest’ theatrical release of the month — usually (but not always) the one that’s also in my header image — but November has offered up a few of fairly equal standing. Depending on your personal proclivities, you may feel last month’s most noteworthy new release was (in alphabetical order) belated and somewhat unexpected sequel Gladiator II, or TV series turned sequel film Moana 2, or heartwarming threequel Paddington in Peru, or prequel musical adaptation Wicked.

There were also other movies released — ones that weren’t tied to existing properties, even! While none can claim to be as juggernaut-like in their current impact, they may yet be felt come awards season — Sean Baker’s Anora, for example; or maybe even papal thriller Conclave, which seems to have strong buzz. On the other hand, I’ve not heard anyone say a good word about Christmas fantasy-actioner Red One (it has such strong “direct to Netflix” vibes that I was surprised to discover it was a theatrical release). Also filling screens someplace were Hugh Grant horror Heretic (who thought it was a good idea to release that the day after Halloween?!), Clint Eastwood’s courtroom thriller Juror #2, LEGO-based Pharrell Williams biopic Piece by Piece, and documentary Super/Man: The Christopher Reeve Story.

Over on the streamers, we find more premieres with award season buzz, like Netflix’s Emilia Pérez (literally all I’ve heard about it is from Best Picture nominee prediction lists on social media); and more films with strong critical receptions, like Disney+ cerebral palsy drama Out of My Mind (literally hadn’t heard of it until I saw a news article about its 100% Rotten Tomatoes score), or anime Look Back on Amazon Prime (I noticed it when it catapulted into the upper echelons of the Letterboxd Top 250 a little while ago. Whenever anime do that, they’re usually still a ways off from getting a UK release, so it was a pleasant surprise to see it on Amazon so soon). Other films with varying claims of “newness” (by which I mean: I can’t be bothered to look up if they’re streaming originals or actually released somewhere else first with so little noise that their streaming debut is the first I’ve seen of them) included ‘birth of IVF’ drama Joy, animation Spellbound, and generational drama The Piano Lesson (all Netflix); on Prime, sort-of-time-travel comedy My Old Ass, and Jude Law as Henry VIII opposite Alicia Vikander as Katherine Parr in Firebrand (apparently it suffers in comparison to the currently-airing second series of Wolf Hall); Shackleton doc Endurance on Disney+; and the latest in the never-ending run of actioners starring an aged Liam Neeson, Absolution, this one relegated to the lowly status of a Sky Original.

Conversely, it’s Sky Cinema (and, by extension, NOW) that continue to get most of the biggest streaming premieres of films that had a theatrical run. This month, we were finally treated to The Holdovers. It’s somewhat amusing that they’ve made us wait until Christmas for a Christmas film that was originally released here in January. Other additions included Dev Patel’s directorial debut, Monkey Man (which also featured in this column back in July, when I bought the Blu-ray; and before that in April, when it was in cinemas); John Krasinski-directed Ryan Reynolds-starring children’s fantasy thing IF; quirky comedy Sasquatch Sunset; and also Dune: Part Two, but I’ve seen that so it’s not really a failure. And talking of “films that have had two previous mentions” (as I was four films back), Deadpool & Wolverine is on Disney+ already. I say “two previous mentions”: this is its second mention (after its theatrical release in July), because the disc copy I bought but failed to watch will be coming up later in this column, because that’s how much Disney have shrunk the disc/streaming window now.

Catalogue titles doing the streaming shuffle (i.e. they’ve already streamed somewhere before, but now they’re back, probably somewhere different) are headlined by Midsommar, because it’s not been available to stream for a while, which I’m acutely aware of because it’s the most popular film on Letterboxd that I’ve never seen. Now it’s on Amazon Prime, so I can keep intending to watch it but never actually get round to it until one day it suddenly disappears and I curse my ineptitude once again. Fun times. Others I find worthy of particular note (for whatever reason — and I’m saving us all time by not spelling out all those reasons) included Cold Pursuit, The Hunt, M3GAN, Mary Queen of Scots, and Tár on Netflix; Black Adam, Crazy Stupid Love, A Cure for Wellness, The Gentlemen, The Rover, Samurai Marathon, and Whip It on Prime, along with most of the Pink Panther films (I’ve never seen one and think I probably should); The Edge of Seventeen, Krampus, Stalag 17, and Three Days of the Condor on NOW; Bones and All, Dunkirk (the 1958 one), No Bears, and Women Talking on iPlayer, plus documentary Made in England: The Films of Powell and Pressburger, part of a whole season about the Archers (although, of their films that were screened, I either have seen or own them); and C’mon C’mon, Freaky, In the Earth, Lucy in the Sky, The Worst Person in the World, and X on Channel 4.

Not enough? I haven’t even started on stuff I want to rewatch (Get Out, The Kid Detective, Paddington…), or stuff I already own on disc (Alita: Battle Angel, Basic Instinct, Event Horizon…), or stuff I already own on disc and want to rewatch (Collateral, Hero, Ronin…) One particularly worth mentioning that fits the latter camp is It’s a Wonderful Life, which would be a good one for December, obviously. And if we’re doing additional mentions, I’m also gonna chuck in a random discovery called Dragon Crusaders. It looks and sounds like low-budget direct-to-anywhere schlock (“anywhere” in this case being Prime, of course), so normally I’d ignore it, but for some reason I read the plot description: “a group of fugitive Knights Templar attacks a pirate ship… to save the world, they must defeat a wizard-dragon.” You just know it’s going to be disappointing, but it still sounds awesome enough to risk it, right?

Talking of risks, let’s turn to my always “blind buy”-filled list of new purchases from the past month. Case in point: out of 87 films I’m about to mention, I’d only seen eight of them before. Yeah, that’s a lot of films, mainly thanks to it being sale season: between latecomers from Halloween sales, November sales, and Black Friday offers that arrive promptly, I racked up multiple hefty box sets — yes, for the second month in a row. Plus there were some new releases, naturally. I went through them in size order last month, which was kinda fun; and while that won’t get us all the way this month (there’s a lot more regular single-film titles), let’s start off that way.

Biggest by far was Indicator’s Magic, Myth & Mutilation: The Micro-Budget Cinema of Michael J Murphy, 1967–2015, a 26-film (plus some alternate cuts) collection that I’d sat out on originally but caved at sale price. Honestly, I’m not sure how good any of it will be, but I’m intrigued. Next, a brand-new release that maybe I should have waited on — Arrow’s Shawscope: Volume Three — not because I’m concerned about the quality of the 14 martial arts movies it contains, but because both of their previous Shawscope sets have ended up on sale for up to 50% off. I couldn’t risk them having done a shorter print run and accidentally missing out, though. Next, we swing back to Indicator for another catchily-named horror set: The Criminal Acts of Tod Slaughter: Eight Blood-and-Thunder Entertainments, 1935–1940. This eight-film set (clue’s in the subtitle) was one I came close to purchasing on its original release but, with so much coming out all the time nowadays, I had to prioritise my cash elsewhere that month.

Two three-film sets next, so I’ll continue to alternate new releases and sale pickups by first mentioning Eureka’s Super Spies and Secret Lies, a trio of Japanese Bondsploitation efforts; and second, altogether more worthy, Criterion’s Three Revolutionary Films by Ousmane Sembène, which I’d also had my eye on when it came out, but snagged a 40% saving thanks to waiting for a UK sale (not as reliable as their regular-as-clockwork US ones, nor as lucrative (what with those being 50% off), but better than nothing). The multi-film sets come to an end with another pair of two-film sets, which continue the new release/sale pattern. The former: 88 Film’s 4K UHD The Legend of Fong Sai Yuk Collection, with two Jet Li actioners from 1993. The latter: Radiance’s Bandits of Orgosolo, which comes paired with a programme of ten of the director’s short films collectively titled The Lost World.

Next, let’s go back to some themes I’ve already touched on. Titles I tried to sit out but ended up caving for? Radiance’s Häxan (sort of another multi-film set, because it has four different cuts and multiple score options), which I’m actually very interested in… so much so I’d already imported the Criterion. The new special features swung me. Then there was Second Sight’s The Blair Witch Project, which you’ll notice isn’t in bold. That’s because my copy went missing in the post; and because I’d ordered it late, and had to wait until it was officially deemed lost, it had sold out. No limited edition for me, unless I’m willing to fork out silly money (last check: £175+) to a scalper on eBay. Another theme: Criterion sale pick-ups. I upgraded Le Samouraï to 4K, because I heard such good things about the transfer. The other two I got were also in 4K: Lone Star and The Roaring Twenties. One Criterion 4K I didn’t get was Seven Samurai… because I bought the BFI’s release instead. Keeping my old Criterion Blu-ray means I get all the special features from both labels, which is nice. Other extravagant 4K releases included The Third Man (when you open the box it plays the theme music!) and Godzilla Minus One (no music, just a thick and expensive box).

More regular 4K titles included Deadpool & Wolverine (“callback to earlier this post” klaxon), recent acclaimed HK actioner Twilight of the Warriors: Walled In, amateur filmmaking documentary American Movie, Sam Raimi’s Drag Me to Hell, M Night Shyamalan’s Trap, and horror anthology Trapped Ashes. The latter four I had to import from the US, and so along with them came more Criterions (Chimes at Midnight and The Tales of Hoffmann (talking of Powell & Pressburger…)), Russian sort-of-Sherlock Holmes adaptation In the Moscow Slums (it’s partially based on The Sign of Four), folk horror The Savage Hunt of King Stakh, and animation Tamala 2010: A Punk Cat in Space (which won me over by being described as “inspired by both Hello Kitty and Thomas Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49” — I have no strong feelings on Hello Kitty, but I love The Crying of Lot 49). And talking of imports, I went to buy the Turbine (a German label) release of Mission: Impossible – Fallout in 3D and decided to support their efforts to get 3D on disc by ordering the rest of their bundles too, so I’ve found myself with copies of Jurassic World Dominion (which I would’ve bought in 3D in the first place if it had been an option, but now I also own on 4K), the Robert Downey Jr Dolittle, plus animations The Bad Guys, Migration, and Minions: The Rise of Gru (mixed feelings about those four, to be honest).

Let’s wrap this up with a final little cache of new releases: 88 Films’ Black Cat 2; Radiance’s Japan Organised Crime Boss and Panic in Year Zero; and Eureka’s The Sword, which would’ve been a strong contender for my Genre category… if I had any spaces left. Now, it can just compete with every other thing I’ve mentioned in this 152-film column for the one “Failure” slot. (Crikey…)

The Tough Monthly Review of November 2024

Some months, I find it easy to know how to title or theme this monthly review. Other times, it’s tough to come up with an idea.

Yeah.

Anyway, on with the regular stuff…



This month’s viewing towards my yearly challenge

#86 Lee (2023) — New Film #10
#87 Inside Out 2 (2024) — New Film #11
#88 The Seventh Victim (1943) — Failure #11
#89 Duel to the Death (1983) — Genre #9
#90 Blitz (2024) — Wildcard #10
#91 The Cranes Are Flying (1957) — Blindspot #11
#92 Dragons Forever (1988) — Genre #10
#93 First Knight (1995) — Rewatch #11


  • I watched 11 feature films I’d never seen before in November.
  • Seven of them counted towards my 100 Films in a Year Challenge, along with one rewatch.
  • I’d hoped to get to #95 this month, which is the maximum I could by the end of November (because five categories have a “one per month” limiter in their rules). Still, only having seven left for December feels manageable.
  • Perhaps more importantly: reaching #90 means I’ve already beaten how far I made it in 2022’s Challenge (which I chose to abandon at #89).
  • And reaching #93 means I’ve also beaten 2023 (which I didn’t consciously abandon, although I stood no serious chance of achieving it at this point that year, when I entered December with 17 films still to go).
  • Shockingly, I almost made it all the way through the Martial Arts Genre category without properly including Jackie Chan (although he did feature in the clip-based documentary I watched as the category’s first film). With hundreds of films to choose from to finish off the category, making sure to include Chan properly seemed as good a deciding factor as any; although Letterboxd’s new list-stats feature showed me even that left 40 films to pick from. I chose Dragons Forever because it co-stars fellow big names Sammo Hung and Yuen Biao, and was the trio’s final collaboration. That seemed like a fitting end-cap for the year.
  • More importantly: this is the first year I’ve actually completed the Genre category! (Though, as a caveat, I did watch 11 (out of 12) films for it in 2022, which would’ve been enough to meet the reduced count of 10 in 2023 and 2024.)
  • After reading ghostof82’s review, I found I had the passion* to make it happen**, and so watched Flashdance. It didn’t qualify for the Challenge, but I felt like mentioning it.***
    * a vague interest that wasn’t there before
    ** watch a film that was available on a streamer I’m already subscribed to
    *** just so I could repeat this quote/footnotes joke from my Letterboxd.
  • This month’s Blindspot film was Russian wartime drama The Cranes Are Flying.
  • No WDYMYHS films this month, even though I should have watched two. I’m at the pointy end of the IMDb Top 250 now, with all the films I’ve not already got round to for one reason or another; usually length or seriousness of subject. Getting through three of those in December — when the vibes are Christmassy joy, and so much time is consumed with family activities — is going to be the most challenging aspect of completing my Challenge.
  • From last month’s “failures” I watched The Seventh Victim.



The 114th Monthly Arbitrary Awards

Favourite Film of the Month
There were several strong contenders this month, and several where the difference between “best” and “favourite” may have come into play. Ultimately, I think the answer is probably the same either way, because I’m going to select Russian World War 2 drama The Cranes Are Flying — not the most fun film I watched this month, nor necessarily the one I’d rewatch soonest, but surely the most accomplished.

Least Favourite Film of the Month
I suspect I’m broadly politically aligned with Ken Loach, but that doesn’t mean I enjoyed The Old Oak. Sure, its storylines are worthy and its ultimate perspective correct, but it’s still heavy-handed, borderline amateurish, and occasionally a tough watch (as soon as the cute little dog encountered the barely-controlled bully breeds, I knew where that subplot was going).

The Audience Award for Most-Viewed New Post of the Month
Since I’ve brought them back (albeit at the current rate of one a month — maybe I’ll manage to increase that in 2025?), film reviews have consistently outshone monthly reviews; and so it is this month too, with my review of Rosemary’s Baby the clear victor from November’s new posts.



Every review posted this month, including new titles and the Archive 5


Will it be third time lucky? I failed my new-style Challenge in its first two years, but this time I’m closer than ever. We’ll find out sometime in the next 31 days…

Rosemary’s Baby (1968)

Roman Polanski | 138 mins | UHD Blu-ray | 1.85:1 | USA / English | 18 / R

Rosemary's Baby

If you came to Rosemary’s Baby without any kind of context about its place in film history, you might well conclude it had been made in the last few years. Well, if you learnt about it on paper — visually, it’s obviously a film of the’60s thanks to its cinematography and production design (not a criticism; indeed, if anything, that’s praise). But in terms of its plot, its themes, its characters and their relationships, and what they might be signifying, that all feels quite ‘of the moment’. Maybe it did in the ’60s too. Maybe it has in every time period since — maybe that’s why the film has endured so well for over 50 years. (Plenty of other films have endured just as long — and longer — without feeling pressingly relevant to the present day, so I don’t want to overemphasise that point too much.) If it had been made more recently, the usual blowhards would be decrying it as “woke” and that it debases the traditional family unit, or something. The fact you can apply such ‘arguments’ as readily to something made over half a century ago as you can to something produced today is just one reason they’re absolute bollocks. But I digress.

To dig deeper into what the film is saying about such things, and how and why, necessitates some spoilers. I know some people think it’s ridiculous to consider spoilers in the context of a film as old as this, but there are always new generations and more people coming afresh to any film decades later — heck, I’ve only just watched it; that’s the whole point of this. That said, Rosemary’s Baby is sort of a self-spoiling film. We all know it’s a horror movie, so when it starts out like a pleasant slice-of-life domestic drama about a young couple moving into a new apartment building, making friends with their quirky neighbours, and deciding to start a family… well, we already know that’s not all it’s going to be, and the hints at more sinister goings-on are easy to spot.

Rosemary's scream

This is another way one might argue it feels modern, as it’s close to the “elevated horror” sub-genre that’s sprung up in the past few years. Again, the fact works like this have existed since at least the ’60s — and I’m sure there are other horror movies that could be similarly classified — shows that so many “new” things have actually been around before, we’ve just forgotten them, or not bothered to label them. Basically, rather than being an outright schlocky genre movie, it’s restrained and dramatic and realistic (in tone, at least). There’s not even an early fake-out jump scare to reassure you you’re watching a genre piece, a trick employed by so many films where the real frights only come in later. There’s a conceivable version of this film where the big reveal is that everyone’s normal, Rosemary was paranoid, and you’ve been watching a mental health drama, and literally all you’d have to change for that to work is the events of the final few minutes.

Indeed, it’s interesting to sort of take a step back and almost-objectively consider this as “a horror movie”. There are very few (if any) scares, and it doesn’t create the same kind of uneasy irrepressible mood as something like The Shining; although I would wager it can have a different effect on women, especially women of childbearing age, than it does on me, because the horrors are that much closer to home. I don’t think it’s failing in those respects — it’s not setting out to terrify you and then failing to achieve it — I just think it’s going for a different kind of horror. It’s the slow realisation that something is not just ‘not right’ but definitely very wrong; and by the time you grasp the scale of it, it’s too late to do anything; and too insidious to convince anyone else that it’s real. In that sense, it really is a good analogy for things like toxic relationships that look fine to the outside world.

And that’s the way in which the film is most modern, as I was saying at the start. Its central concerns seem to be issues of women’s bodily autonomy, controlling relationships, the way they isolate their victims and lead to abuse. If you want to close your senses to such unmissable subtext, I guess you could still see the film as no more than a genre piece about (spoilers!) a cult trying to birth the Antichrist, but I think you’d be burying your head in the sand to do so. Sure, the film doesn’t expressly call those elements out — doesn’t underscore them, or bluntly explain that’s what’s going on in modern terminology — but they’re inescapably in the mix. I do think that’s a difference between the film having been made in the late ’60s vs today: now, it would be hard to resist thoroughly leaning into those themes and making them more overt, because they’re things we’re much more aware of as a society, and much more concerned with combating. Again, it’s not that they’re exactly subtle here, but you get the sense some of the psychology involved was still not widely understood; that there perhaps wasn’t yet the agreed-upon terminology to explicitly call it out, other than to present it and show how negative it was.

Controlling relationships

All of which said, the timeliness or otherwise of the film’s concerns is irrelevant to its overall quality. As much as it would be a key point of interest to some, I’m sure it’s of no matter to others. Either way, though, Rosemary’s Baby remains a compelling story because of how it grounds its supernatural goings-on in day-to-day life. Without playing the “is it or isn’t it” angle, it nonetheless renders them almost mundane — these devil-worshippers aren’t wearing robes, enacting elaborate arcane rituals in ancient stone circles in the British countryside: they’re modern-day Americans, living pretty typical lives in a New York apartment block. Horror can exist everywhere and anywhere; it is everyday. Oops, maybe we’ve come back round to making a sociological point again…

5 out of 5

Rosemary’s Baby is the 82nd film in my 100 Films in a Year Challenge 2024. It was viewed as part of Blindspot 2024. It was my Favourite Film of the Month in October 2024.