Once Upon a Time in the West (1968)

100 Films’ 100 Favourites #67

There were three men in her life.
One to take her…
one to love her…
and one to kill her.

Original Title: C’era una volta il West

Country: Italy, USA, Spain & Mexico
Language: English and/or Italian
Runtime: 166 minutes (international) | 145 minutes (US theatrical) | 175 minutes (Italy)
BBFC: A (cut, 1969) | 15 (1989) | 12 (2011)
MPAA: PG (1969) | PG-13 (2003)

Original Release: 21st December 1968 (Italy)
UK Release: 14th August 1969
First Seen: DVD, c.2003

Claudia Cardinale (, Fitzcarraldo)
Henry Fonda (My Darling Clementine, 12 Angry Men)
Jason Robards (Hour of the Gun, Tora! Tora! Tora!)
Charles Bronson (The Magnificent Seven, Death Wish)

Sergio Leone (A Fistful of Dollars, Once Upon a Time in America)

Sergio Donati (Face to Face, A Fistful of Dynamite)
Sergio Leone (The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, A Fistful of Dynamite)

Story by
Dario Argento (Deep Red, Suspiria)
Bernardo Bertolucci (The Conformist, The Last Emperor)
Sergio Leone (The Last Days of Pompeii, For a Few Dollars More)

The Story
The mysterious Harmonica arrives in the town of Flagstone, out for revenge against Frank. Frank, working for a railroad baron, is busy murdering Brett McBain for his land and blaming the crime on the bandit Cheyenne. Cheyenne teams up with Harmonica to help McBain’s newly-arrived widow, and therefore owner of his land, Jill. Jill finds herself caught in the crossfire between the three men pursuing their own interests…

Our Heroes
Jill McBain, a former prostitute who’s still subject to the will and whims of men. Harmonica, a formidable gunslinger known only by the instrument he plays. Even Cheyenne, a bandit leader, is a good buy when they’re all arranged against…

Our Villain
Frank, the meanest sonuvabitch in the West. What did he do to Harmonica in the past? What will he do to Jill to get his way? Nothing good…

Best Supporting Character
Crippled railroad tycoon Morton only wants to intimidate the McBains to relinquish their land, which I guess makes him a nice guy when compared to his murderous handyman, Frank, who he clearly can’t control.

Memorable Quote
Harmonica: “Did you bring a horse for me?”
Snaky: “Well, looks like we’re… looks like we’re shy one horse.”
Harmonica: “You brought two too many.”

Memorable Scene
In one of the most iconic opening sequences in cinema history, three gunmen arrive at a train station and… wait for a train. For ten minutes. Ten real-time minutes, accompanied only by sounds like a squeaky windmill, a dripping water tower, and distant bird cries. Then the train arrives… and then the train leaves… and then a harmonica plays. And the action… threatens to start. Ah, Leone.

Memorable Music
It’s a Sergio Leone film, of course there’s an Ennio Morricone score — and it’s one of his best. It was composed before shooting began so Leone could play it on set, so it fits like a glove. The best bits include the striking leitmotifs: a haunting one for Jill, with wordless vocals by Edda Dell’Orso, and a dramatic one for Harmonica, threatening guitar combined with a melody played on a… well, you know.

Technical Wizardry
The entire picture looks fantastic thanks to the work of cinematographer Tonino Delli Colli. It displays all the framing and composition Leone is famous for, but also evokes an oppressive hot, sweaty feeling, and the light and texture of the image have pure cinematic quality. They don’t make ’em like this anymore.

Letting the Side Down
Leone’s original plan was for the three gunmen in the opening scene to be cameos for the stars of The Good, the Bad and the Ugly — Clint Eastwood, Lee Van Cleef and Eli Wallach — but Eastwood (who’d already turned down the role of Harmonica) was unavailable. Shame.

Next time…
Considered by some to be the first part of a thematic “Once Upon a Time” trilogy, which continues with A Fistful of Dynamite (released in some regions as Once Upon a Time… the Revolution) and Once Upon a Time in America.

What the Critics Said
“The world of a Leone Western is just as enchanted as it was in the films the director saw as a child, but the values have become confused. Heroes as well as villains are apt to be motivated by greed and revenge, and the environments in which they operate are desolate and godless, though very beautiful. The Leone Westerns are twice removed from reality, being based on myths that were originally conceived in Hollywood studios in the nineteen-thirties. […] Once Upon the Time in the West thus is a movie either for the undiscriminating patron or for the buff. If you fall somewhere in between those categories, you had better stay home” — Vincent Canby, The New York Times (Just so we’re clear, I think this is a terrible review.)

Score: 98%

What the Public Say
“The clue’s in the title: Once Upon a Time in the West is a fairy story, a mythologised version of the American West, peopled with immediately recognisable archetypes. It’s also a commentary on the Western genre itself, and a celebration in the form of a kind of “greatest hits”, full of references to other films and filmmakers: John Ford, George Stevens, Anthony Mann, Shane, The Searchers, High Noon, and so on. […] So the game isn’t originality, but Everything More Iconic Than Everyone Else. Westerns – even great Westerns – would follow, directed by the likes of Sam Peckinpah, Walter Hill, and Eastwood himself, but [this] still feels like the genre’s final word.” — Owen Williams


America didn’t ‘get’ Once Upon a Time in the West when it first came out (hence the retrospectively laughable reviews, like the one above). The French did, though: it played for literally years in Paris cinemas, even inspiring fashion trends (the long duster coats). I confess, my initial reaction was a little more akin to the Americans’ — OUaTitW can be quite a slow film, and the plot is deceptively obscured until quite late on. But it certainly rewards repeat viewings, because it’s a film of rich content and, perhaps even more importantly, supreme style and technical achievement. The French were right (but don’t tell them that).

#68 will be… completed while you shop.

9 thoughts on “Once Upon a Time in the West (1968)

  1. I remember the first time I saw the film was a late night BBC showing around 1989 or 1990, I think. Yes, I found it long and slow that first time, but fascinating for all that. I never felt bored and was captivated right till the end when all is finally revealed.
    On the reported plans for the beginning, I’m actually glad that never happened – it would have been far too gimmicky and this is a wonderful film which doesn’t need that.

    Liked by 1 person

    • It is quite a gimmicky idea, but I’m a bit of a sucker for a gimmick sometimes. I suppose, while it might’ve been quite fun at first, it would tire with time. And as you say, it’s not as if the film needs it.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Brilliant film. Possibly one of my top ten faves (if not, definitely top twenty). They certainly don’t make ’em like this anymore. I always sway between this and Good, the Bad and the Ugly as my favourite all-time Western. The only Leone film I like more is Once Upon a Time in America, which is just pure cinematic poetry in my book. I guess it didn’t make the cut for your top 100 though.

    This film though, remains one of the genuine milestones in cinema. Modern so-called epics and blockbusters and the hacks that direct them will be long forgotten and films like this still held up as works of art, not just popular art. When I think about it, it makes me quite depressed about the films we get today. Leone’s films were Cinema with a capital ‘C’. Not sure what the hell the current stuff is best described as.

    Liked by 2 people

    • I was a huge fan of TGTB&TU when I was younger but it’s declined in my estimation over time. I still like it well enough but I find it much more juvenile in tone that this one. There might only be a few years between the two films but there is gulf in terms of maturity – see also A Fistful of Dynamite/Duck, You Sucker!/Giù la Testa.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Goodness, yes, A Fistful of Dynamite is great too (which reminds me I have a blu-ray of it I need to watch having replaced my DVD last year). I think my affection for Good, The Bad & The Ugly is from the impact it made on me when I first saw it as a kid. It blew me away- what a ride that film is, and that incredible operatic face-off at the end. Leone was a master, no doubt about it.

        Liked by 2 people

    • You don’t get many films that straddle the boundary between art and populism anymore like Leone at his best, or lots of other filmmakers of the ’60s & ’70s I suppose. That’s the marketplace, really: either straight-up blockbusters, or it’s off to the arthouse — both of which have their own respective problems.

      That said, I don’t think all is lost. The Revenant comes to mind as a pretty fine example of something made with artistry that also connected with ‘regular’ filmgoers. The likes of Scorsese, Fincher, even Spielberg and maybe Nolan still have the potential. Heck, Ridley Scott, for his faults, knows how to make a film look like a Film (as much it pains me to admit it, there’s merit to the argument that a lot of blockbusters are beginning to look like really, really expensive TV).

      Liked by 1 person

      • I might be wrong but I do think that film-makers aren’t using the widescreen frame as well as their peers used to. John Carpenter was brilliant at framing shots for widescreen (influenced by Leone no doubt) but few directors seem to do that kind of framing/positioning of elements anymore. Maybe it is the prominence of 16×9 displays and how television programs (like Game of Thrones) use that widescreen tv frame, influencing films that transfer so quickly to home viewing. Films had a longer lifespan in the cinema in the old days, with re-runs and longer exhibition periods, tv seemed a distant afterthought to the likes of Leone and David Lean, nowadays its almost the prime target audience considering the lifespan of films on home formats.

        Liked by 1 person

        • I think that home viewing is definitely a consideration for some directors. I was reading a piece on Criterion’s website the other day about the colour correction they’d done for a few releases (this one, to be exact — I actually have a link for once!), and they talk about how directors never used to like coming in to supervise home video versions, but Ang Lee points out more people will see the film that way; and he insists on doing the final grade on a TV screen rather than projector to make sure it’s right.

          I suppose that’s practical, whereas the downside is that studios mandate directors frame shots to be “TV safe”. Well, I don’t know if they still do (most home formats maintain the OAR these days, after all), but I saw a thing back in the mid ‘00s which demonstrated that you could take any shot from any modern studio-produced 2.35:1 film, and everything you actually needed to see was within the 16:9 section in the middle. Having to conform to those kinds of restraints must at the least be distracting.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.