The Best of 2024

It’s time to finally let go of last year with my annual summation of what I liked best about it. Well, some of that, anyway. And then some more of that. And then a bunch of stuff I missed and so I don’t know if they were any good or not. Confused? Each bit will make sense when we get to it, I’m sure.

Anyway, before we get stuck in, my usual reminders. All the movies I watched for the first time in 2024 are eligible for this list, not just brand-new releases. And this is a ‘top ten’ in the sense that it’s the top 10% of my 2024 viewing. I watched 131 films for the first time last year, which means this time it’s a top thirteen.



The Thirteen Best Films I Watched for the First Time in 2024

I’ve called this “best films” because I always have, but this year I’ve definitely leant more into “favourites” in my decision-making. Maybe I always do, but when compiling this list, I was particularly conscious of choosing 4-star or borderline 5-star films I’d really enjoyed over 5-star films that I’d strongly admired.


I love a good sword fight, and this packs seven superb ones into a tight 85 minutes, while still finding room for some honour-based moral conflict. [Full review.]

12

The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert


The perspective on drag- and trans-related issues feels ridiculously pertinent for something made 30 years ago, but it’s really the inherent joy, humour, and a degree of iconoclasm that makes this enduringly enjoyable.

11

The Menu


Some reviewers focused on the unsubtle social commentary, though I’d argue it’s only a significant problem if you disagree with it. Either way, set that aside and this is clearly an accessible edge-of-your-seat slow-burn thriller.

10

Dungeons & Dragons: Honour Among Thieves


In my Letterboxd review I commented that it’s “the kind of film I give 4 stars then put on my end-of-year top ten anyway” and, well, lookee here. I also said “it’s a stonkingly fun fantasy action-adventure flick whether you know the lore / rules [of D&D] or not”, and that’s also true.


By all rights a live-action Barbie movie should be kiddie-aimed toy-advertisement slop, but put it in the hands of genuine auteurs (i.e. producer Margot Robbie and cowriter/director Greta Gerwig) and you end up with a movie that actually has something to say about women’s (and men’s) place in our world and how the toys we give to children have a role in reflecting and shaping — or perhaps distracting from — that reality. Lest that makes it sound like a lecture, it’s still a witty brightly-coloured entertainment. [Full review.]

8

Look Back


The only 2024 film to make my list this year is an hour-long anime about the evolving friendship between two girls as they develop from drawing manga for their school newsletter to producing it professionally… which is also kinda beside the point, but to say too much about where the story goes and what it’s really about would lessen its impact. It also serves a reminder that films don’t need an epic length to be powerful — let movies be as long as they need to be (and sometimes, that means let them be short).

7

The Best Years of Our Lives


This won seven Oscars and sits on both the IMDb and Letterboxd Top 250s, and yet I’d argue it’s underrated; by which I guess I really mean you never hear anyone talk about it, which lessens its significance. It’s one of the last films from the IMDb list that I’ve watched for that reason: it was never a movie others made me feel I had to see. But I’m so glad I got there in the end, because it might just be a masterpiece, which depicts the fallout for American servicemen and their families in the wake of World War 2, via a trio of compelling storylines and across-the-board quality performances.

6

The Good, the Bad, the Weird


This self-described “Oriental Western” remixes Sergio Leone (the title is no coincidence) with a dash of Tarantino-esque modernism and a sprinkling of Mad Max dynamism, powered by whatever incredible energy has made South Korea a breeding ground for remarkable cult-hit movies over the past… well, quarter-century, now. It might technically be derivative (as I said, the Leone allusion is deliberate, as are other obvious homages), but the result still feels fresh, exciting, and boundlessly fun.

5

Army of Shadows


My list almost swings from one extreme to another now, as the next couple of films are Very Serious. First, Jean-Pierre Melville’s truth-based thriller about the French Resistance. Time has perhaps diluted the Anglosphere’s view of France in World War 2, thanks to comedies like ‘Allo ‘Allo! and that one oft-repeated Simpsons joke about “cheese-eating surrender monkeys” (if you doubt the significance of one gag, it has a Wikipedia entry which summarises its impact), but Army of Shadows is a brutal reminder of the dangers faced and sacrifices made by the Resistance. It’s a fittingly tense and uncompromising film, at times even uncomfortable, but the cumulative effect is an unparalleled thriller.


Similarly to Army of Shadows, Denis Villeneuve’s breakthrough film takes a real-life conflict (although here it’s anonymised into a fictional country) to examine the fallout of horrendous acts of violence, but in the cinematic form of an engrossing mystery thriller. Wanting those answers helps pull the viewer through the film’s bleaker sequences, including a bus-based centrepiece that is hellish, heartrending, and incredibly produced. And when we finally get the answers, they’re no less surprising and shocking than the rest. [Full review.]

3

My Darling Clementine


Westerns have never been a particular favourite genre of mine. I don’t think I even saw one until I studied them for an A level module (Back to the Future Part III excepted). When I do watch them, I assume my taste will err more towards the revisionism of Spaghetti Westerns or more modern takes. Perhaps it does overall, but that doesn’t mean a classic Western can’t still hit the spot — and John Ford’s My Darling Clementine most certainly does that. As one of the earliest cinematic depictions of the gunfight at the O.K. Corral, it may not be historically accurate, but that scarcely matters when the entire film is so on-point otherwise. Heck, even the day-for-night photography looks good. Day-for-night never looks good! Remarkable.

2

RRR


If all you’ve seen of RRR is the Oscar-winning Naatu Naatu sequence, you’d be forgiven for thinking it’s about Indian bros overcoming colonial bullies with the power of dance. And, well, you’d be correct, partly. Loosely (oh so loosely) based on the life of two real revolutionaries, RRR is also an action movie with sequences of unleashed imagination — the kind of over-the-top reality-defying CGI-aided fun Western filmmakers seem to be incapable of conjuring. It’s also a first-rate bromance, full of big emotion in its undulations of friendship and betrayal. Emotion so big it can only be conveyed through song, because of course it’s a musical too. Is there anything RRR isn’t? Yeah: subtle. But who needs subtlety when you’re this badass?

1

Bottoms


Regular readers may be aware that I don’t rewatch films all that often (that’s why I’ve had various strategies over the past few years to prompt rewatches) and I certainly don’t rewatch things quickly — if I watch a film twice within about five years, it feels like a fairly quick revisit (for a somewhat-timely example: I feel I watched Home Alone on a recent Christmas. I checked: it was 2017). This background is to help you understand the significance of the fact that, after I finished watching Bottoms for the first time, I immediately put it on again. I can remember one other occasion in my life when I’ve watched the same film twice back-to-back (my third and fourth viewings of Serenity, when it was screened by my university film society). Is that reason enough to declare Bottoms my favourite first-time watch of 2024? Not really (any number of factors could influence such a decision, not just “that was so perfect I must break the habit of a lifetime and watch it again immediately”), and I did pause to consider if I was letting that one aspect influence my decision (I concluded not). But it does help indicate how much I enjoyed it, and that’s why it’s #1.

As usual, I’ll take a moment to highlight a few other films.

Traditionally I don’t list “some more films I almost put in my top list” in this section, because if I’m going to do that, why not make the main list longer and rank them properly? That said, ranking is an imprecise art — on a different day, I might’ve erred a different way and my top 13 would be in a different order and/or include some different films. So, with that in mind, the films that survived my long list of 46 to be among the final considerations were (in strictly alphabetical order) American Fiction, The Cranes Are Flying, Dune: Part Two, The Holdovers, Rosemary’s Baby, and Scenes from a Marriage.

Now, to recap the 12 films that won the Arbie for my Favourite Film of the Month. Some of them have already been mentioned in this post, some haven’t; either way, in chronological order (with links to the relevant awards), they were Bottoms, RRR, My Darling Clementine, American Fiction, Dungeons & Dragons: Honour Among Thieves, Yi Yi, Army of Shadows, The Swordsman of All Swordsmen, Incendies, Rosemary’s Baby, The Cranes Are Flying, and The Good, the Bad, the Weird. (The first three being my eventual top three of the year is a whopping coincidence, not some kind of bizarre conspiracy, I promise.)

Finally, as always, a mention for the 14 films that earned 5-star ratings this year. (In my stats post I said it was 13, because I slipped up. None of these ratings are truly locked until I post a review, anyway (sometimes the process of writing the review causes me to reassess), so I’ll leave it as it is.) Nine of them made it into the top ten, including The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert, Army of Shadows, The Best Years of Our Lives, Bottoms, The Good, the Bad, the Weird, Incendies, Look Back, My Darling Clementine, and RRR. The other five were American Fiction, The Cranes Are Flying, The Holdovers, Rosemary’s Baby, and Scenes from a Marriage.

Here’s an alphabetical list of 50 films from 2024 that I haven’t yet seen. They’ve been chosen for a variety of reasons, from box office success to critical acclaim via simple notoriety, representing a spread of styles and genres, successes and failures — with the caveat that I’ve almost certainly forgotten or misjudged something really noteworthy.

Abigail
Challengers
Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire
Kung Fu Panda 4
Mufasa: The Lion King
Wicked
Alien: Romulus
Deadpool & Wolverine
Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes
Moana 2
Nosferatu
The Wild Robot
Abigail
Alien: Romulus
Anora
Back to Black
Bad Boys: Ride or Die
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice
Better Man
The Brutalist
Carry-On
Challengers
Civil War
Conclave
Deadpool & Wolverine
Despicable Me 4
Drive-Away Dolls
Emilia Pérez
Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga
Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire
Gladiator II
Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire
Here
Horizon: An American Saga – Chapter 1
I Saw the TV Glow
It Ends with Us
Joker: Folie à Deux
Juror #2
Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes
Kraven the Hunter
Kung Fu Panda 4
Longlegs
The Lord of the Rings: The War of the Rohirrim
Love Lies Bleeding
Madame Web
Mean Girls
Megalopolis
Moana 2
Monkey Man
Mufasa: The Lion King
Nosferatu
Paddington in Peru
Queer
Rebel Ridge
Red One
The Substance
Transformers One
Trap
Twisters
Venom: The Last Dance
Wicked: Part I
The Wild Robot

Good golly, that’s another year over! In terms of the history of this blog, 2024 will be remembered as the year I completed my new-style Challenge for the first time. But I can’t rest there: it’s time to try to do it all over again for 2025.

The Spooky Monthly Review of October 2024

I’ve never been one to go in for the whole “watch only horror movies in October” thing. I’m not enough of a fan of the genre to delight in the prospect of immersing myself in it for 31 days straight; and, while I’m sure I have more than enough qualifying titles I want to see to fill that period (probably several times over), there’s so much else to watch too. I don’t know if I’ve ever gone a whole October without watching a single horror movie (I haven’t bothered to go back and check), but the very fact I think it’s possible says all it needs to, I feel.

That said, this year I did make a bit of an effort — while also aiming to hit my remaining Challenge categories, of course. So, for example, I picked out martial arts horror movies to tick off slot(s) in the Genre category; for my Rewatch, I looked to horror movies I’d been meaning to revisit; and for Blindspot, I specifically saved the two horror titles for this month — they weren’t originally included for that purpose (if they had been, I would’ve only picked one), but it’s a fringe benefit.

Well, those were my plans, anyway. Did I meet them all, or did I drift somewhere along the way? Read on to find out…



This month’s viewing towards my yearly challenge

#76 Attempt to Kill (1961) — Wildcard #7
#77 Man Detained (1961) — Wildcard #8
#78 Host (2020) — Failure #10
#79 Encounter of the Spooky Kind (1980) — Genre #7
#80 Erin Brockovich (2000) — Rewatch #10
#81 The Wages of Fear (1953) — WDYMYHS #9
#82 Rosemary’s Baby (1968) — Blindspot #9
#83 Dreadnaught (1981) — Genre #8
#84 Possession (1981) — Blindspot #10
#85 The Guest (2014) — Wildcard #9


  • I watched ten feature films I’d never seen before in October.
  • Eight of them counted towards my 100 Films in a Year Challenge, along with two rewatches.
  • I only ‘needed’ to get to #83 this month, so I’m currently ahead of schedule. More on why that’s especially beneficial right now in the “next month” section.
  • Outside of the Challenge, Encounter of the Spooky Kind was my 100th new film in 2024. That may not be my ‘official’ goal anymore, but hitting that milestone still feels worthy of note.
  • This month’s Genre films were both chosen because they were also labelled as horror films. Encounter lived up to it; Dreadnaught was a stretch (it’s sort of like a slasher movie, but only in a handful of individual sequences, not across the entire movie).
  • Three more Wildcards down, leaving just one for the final sixth of the year. I should have gone for a New Film on Halloween (I even had several horror options on hand), as I didn’t watch a 2024 release in October in the end, but I really fancied rewatching The Guest (which, if you don’t know, is set around Halloween, including a climax at the venue for a high school Halloween dance).
  • Possibly my most film-snob-y habit / opinion / whatever is that I insist on watching (feature) films on a TV (or at the cinema, obv). I don’t watch them on a computer; nor on a tablet; certainly not on a phone. But I made an exception for Host, because it’s such a ‘Zoom call’ movie that it kinda felt wrong to watch it on my TV when it was just as easy to watch it on my desktop (because it’s streaming on iPlayer).
  • This month’s Blindspot films were a pair of horror flicks I’d been saving especially for October, so I’m glad I got them both in. Specifically, they were Roman Polanski’s Rosemary’s Baby and Andrzej Zulawski’s Possession. Also, I’ve just realised they were both directed by Polish émigrés and about bad/abusive marriages. Coincidencetastic!
  • I didn’t have any outright horror films to choose for this month’s WDYMYHS viewing, but I went for The Wages of Fear because it has “fear” in the title — as good a reason as any, I guess.
  • From last month’s “failures” I watched Host.



The 113th Monthly Arbitrary Awards

Favourite Film of the Month
It was a largely middling month, quality-wise, which would often make this category hard, but in fact made it easy, because one new film I watched was actually great and so stood head and shoulders above the others — that being Rosemary’s Baby. (I just realised the award title doesn’t actually specify “new film”, but it should. If rewatches were eligible, The Guest would’ve walked it.)

Least Favourite Film of the Month
The flip side to (almost) everything being middling is that there was nothing outright terrible. The two I’d single out at the bottom of the barrel are Dreadnaught and Attempt to Kill. The latter takes it because, although it’s not bad, it is thoroughly mediocre from beginning to end; and while I didn’t actually care for a lot of Dreadnaught, at least it has some fantastic sequences.

The Audience Award for Most-Viewed New Post of the Month
There was only one film review to compete with my monthly summary and “failures” this month. Whether or not the fact it was for an acclaimed film by a beloved director had any bearing on the post’s success, I don’t know; but either way, the victory goes to Incendies.



Every review posted this month, including new titles and the Archive 5


Just two months of the year remain, and I feel like I need to be tactically-minded to complete my goals — after all, I failed in my New 100 Films Challenge in both its first and second years, so perhaps a different focus is needed to get it over the line this time.

On the bright side, I’m currently ahead of target pace, which is potentially a big bonus. That should go without saying as a general point, but it’s specifically the case with regard to the end of December. The final weeks of the year are a bad time to be trying to catch up, or even stay on target, as Christmastime family commitments make it trickier to watch films (especially specific films, as opposed to “what can we find to appease everyone?”) If I can get further ahead of target in November, that might enable me to push through the final few Challenge films in early December. According to the rules, December could be left with a minimum of five films (a new film, a rewatch, a ‘failure’ from November, plus the twelfth films from Blindspot and WDYMYHS) — if I can get to #95 by the end of November, that would be super.

All of which said, I don’t want to ‘gamify’ my film viewing too much, because that tick-box mentality is not the right way to approach art. But it’s been my attitude (for almost 18 whole years now) that if having these goals pushes me to watch a film, rather than spending another evening deciding it would be easier to just veg on social media or whatever, that can only be a good thing.

Incendies (2010)

Denis Villeneuve | 131 mins | UHD Blu-ray | 1.85:1 | Canada & France / French & Arabic | 15 / R

Incendies

The Best Foreign Language Film category at the 2011 Oscars is, in retrospect, a pretty impressive year. Alejandro González Iñárritu was already well established before his nominated film, Biutiful, but his fellow nominees included Yorgos Lanthimos for only his third feature, Dogtooth, and Denis Villeneuve for this, his second after his career re-start. And yet the winner was In a Better World. Remember that? Me neither. (I don’t even recall it ever being mentioned in the last near-decade-and-a-half; although its director was Susanne Bier, who’s gone on to the likes of The Night Manager and Bird Box, so that’s something). It seems like an odd choice for victor with the power of hindsight, but that’s hindsight for you. On the other hand, watching Incendies, it’s hard to see how anyone could ever have missed its incredible power. (Or maybe In a Better World is even better. I struggle to believe that possibility, but you never know… and probably never will, because who’s still watching it nowadays? It’s certainly not getting a Collector’s Edition-style 4K UHD release from a boutique label — unlike, say, Incendies.)

Incendies is, on the surface, one of those films that can sound off-puttingly heavy: it’s about generational trauma caused by a long-running war in the Middle East. Sure, that kind of thing can be Worthy and Great filmmaking, but egads, hard going. But while Incendies is all those things, it’s also a compelling mystery, which leads to twists worthy of a great thriller. The first of those comes in the film’s setup: Nawal, the mother of a pair of grownup twins has died, and it’s only from her will they learn, first, that their thought-dead father is still alive and, second, that they have an older brother they didn’t know existed. They are tasked with finding both men, and only then will they receive the final letter she has left for them. To do this, they must travel to their mother’s homeland, an unnamed Middle Eastern country (heavily inspired by Lebanon) where the aforementioned war is over, but the scars still linger. As they investigate their mother’s previous life, we see it play out in flashbacks.

While the film at first seems to be about the twins, it’s really most about Nawal. That’s in part thanks to the incredible performance by Lubna Azabal. She has to portray this woman across decades, from a relative innocent to someone changed and hardened by all she’s been through, and charting every step of that journey, too. Plus, she’s left to convey almost all of that silently. Not that she’s mute, but she’s rarely allowed the shortcut of dialogue that discusses or exposes her emotions and motivations. That we still gain so much understanding of the how and why of Nawal is remarkable, really; a performance that, under different circumstances (let’s be honest: if it were in English) would surely have contended for every major award going.

You and whose army?

The film is not about a specific conflict — that’s part of the reason playwright Wajdi Mouawad didn’t explicitly set his original work in Lebanon, and why Villeneuve ultimately didn’t change that when adapting it. Rather, as Villeneuve says, it’s “about the cycle of anger, the heritage of anger in a family, where in a conscious and subconscious way anger is traveling among family members, and among a society”. The point is not “what happened in Lebanon”, but what happens when families are torn apart, emotionally just as much as physically; what the fallout from that is, and how healing can be found — if, indeed, it can.

Oh dear, it’s all sounding a bit heavy again, isn’t it? And yes, there is an element of Incendies that is like that. It’s the kind of film that uses Radiohead on its soundtrack multiple times. (That said, this is how I feel that band’s dirge-like ambient-noise style of music functions best: as background mood-creating film score, rather than as, y’know, songs.) But, as I said before, this is also a film that plays as an effective mystery. What, exactly, happened to Nawal? Who and where is their father? Who and where is their older brother? Why was this a secret Nawal took to her grave? Why did she feel the need to reveal it posthumously? Any and all of these are questions your stereotypical “art house” movie would leave unanswered, providing vague prompts for you to consider after the film ends — or, inevitably, provoke you to Google “Incendies ending explained”. But Incendies isn’t actually like that — all of those questions are answered, because they’re essential to what the film is about. That they can also be gasp-inducing all-timer reveals is another bonus.

Within that, Villeneuve also shows off the expert filmmaking that has since elevated him to Christopher Nolan-adjacent levels of big-budget auteurist blockbuster-making. There’s a sequence on a bus in the middle of the film that is as tense as any suspense movie, as scary as any horror movie, and as emotionally devastating as any hard-hitting drama. There’s a reason it’s the inspiration for almost every poster and key art piece related to the film. (The exception is the original American theatrical poster, which shows… a woman standing by some sand. Great marketing, folks. Maybe that’s why it didn’t win the Oscar.) It’s an event of such horror that — especially when combined with the shocking revelations later in the film (which, obviously, I’m not going to spoil) — I imagine this is the kind of movie some people swear off ever watching again, like Requiem for a Dream; a big comparison, maybe, but one Incendies is up to.

5 out of 5

Incendies is the 68th film in my 100 Films in a Year Challenge 2024. It was viewed as part of “What Do You Mean You Haven’t Seen All of the IMDb Top 250?”. At time of posting, it was ranked 101st on that list. It was my Favourite Film of the Month in September 2024. It placed 4th on my list of The Best Films I Saw in 2024.

The Incendiary Monthly Review of September 2024

I am the god of hellfire, and I bring you… this month’s films.



This month’s viewing towards my yearly challenge

#67 Godzilla Minus One (2023) — Wildcard #3
#68 Incendies (2010) — WDYMYHS #8
#69 Desperado (1995) — Failure #9
#70 The Fall Guy (2024) — New Film #9
#71 Frozen II 3D (2019) — Wildcard #4
#72 The Batman (2022) — Wildcard #5
#73 Golem (1980) — Wildcard #6
#74 Cutthroat Island (1995) — Rewatch #9
#75 Rio Bravo (1959) — Blindspot #8


  • I watched 10 feature films I’d never seen before in September.
  • Eight of them counted towards my 100 Films in a Year Challenge, along with one rewatch.
  • Four of those qualified as Wildcards. That’s… fine. I mean, I should’ve been watching Blindspot and WDYMYHS films instead, really, but at least I was watching something. I always intend to leave the Wildcards as late in the year as possible, because they’re considerably easier to cross off than some other categories; but I’m also not going to watch a film that could qualify and not count it just so the slot is left open to be filled later — that’s a different kind of madness.
  • I left it so long to watch Godzilla Minus One that I didn’t think it was going to qualify for my Challenge. Let’s walk through the categories. My “New Films” go by UK release date, but G-1 is a seemingly-rare example of a film that is foreign language and an Oscar nominee, but was actually released in the UK in its original year of release. It was on my WDYMYHS list when I published that in January, but has since dropped off the IMDb Top 250 so no longer counts. It was in both May and June’s “Failures” after being surprise dropped on Netflix on June 1st, but I wasn’t subscribed at the time (I’m, uh, still not) so I missed that. It also featured in August’s Failures, but technically that was the black-and-white version so it would sorta be cheating. I could have waited until the UK disc release delivered it onto the Failures for a fourth time, but I have a suspicion that won’t be out until December. There is a theatrical re-release coming in the interim, but that only works for qualification if it (a) screens for more than one night (I don’t think it actually did last time, at least not near me), and (b) it’s released one month and is still screening the next (to qualify as a “failure”, again). But, for all that, it does perennially qualify thanks to being on my 2023 “50 Unseen” list… but I used up all the slots in that category already… but that’s what Wildcards are for! Hurrah! (And whew!)
  • For some reason I thought I had one Series Progression slot left to go, and Frozen II was going to fill that slot. It wasn’t a fault in my record keeping, just in my memory. So, as a wildcard, Frozen II could’ve counted as either Series Progression (that series being the Disney Animated Canon) or 50 Unseen (it was on 2019’s list). I went with the former because, as I said, that’s what I thought I was doing; and also because I’ve already has a 50 Unseen wildcard, so let’s keep it mixed up.
  • I’d been trying to keep the Batman films on my List of Reviews page in some semblance of series order, though that was always made harder by the animated films taking place in various different chronologies, not to mention two-thirds of the Dark Knight trilogy not even beginning with the word “Batman”. Now, after The Batman, I’ve just given in and put it in full-on alphabetical order. That also doesn’t feel quite right (the four Burton+ live-action films are now scattered and out of sequence), but nothing’s perfect (except arguably strict chronological across all the films… but even that throws up oddities, like interrupting the aforementioned live-action run with 1993’s Mask of the Phantasm).
  • This month’s Blindspot film was Howard Hawks and John Wayne’s response to High Noon, Rio Bravo. It’s a good film, though (even setting aside political leanings) I thought High Noon was better.
  • No WDYMYHS film this month, meaning I’m two behind on both the Blindspot categories. That’s intentional for Blindspot itself (I’ve got two horror films on the list, so I intend to watch both of those in October), but WDYMYHS now just needs to be caught up on.
  • From last month’s “failures” I watched Desperado, The Fall Guy, and Golem.



The 112th Monthly Arbitrary Awards

Favourite Film of the Month
Quite a few films I enjoyed this month, even though a couple fell a little short of my high hopes for them (said hopes were probably too high, but what can you do?) One that absolutely lived up to its billing was Denis Villeneuve’s Incendies — one of those films that’s truly gruelling, but also truly exceptional.

Least Favourite Film of the Month
One of the things about liking 3D is that I’ll watch almost anything in 3D, which is how I came to watch “nudie cutie” Adam and 6 Eves. It’s a 60-minute film that exists to primarily show off topless women, with some pun-laden narration because, I dunno, I guess someone thought if they made it funny it would somehow stop it being crass? It didn’t work; it just made it worse.

The Audience Award for Most-Viewed New Post of the Month
Hey, would you look at that: I posted some actual film reviews! And one of them came out on top, too, with The Swordsman of All Swordsmen being my most-viewed post of the month. That said, it was only slightly ahead of the August monthly review; and the other new review post (Hepworth shorts) was way down the list. But if I was doing all this just for hits, I’d’ve given up a long time ago.



Every review posted this month, including new titles and the Archive 5


For some people, October is all about the horror movies. I always feel like I’ll go all-in on that too one year, but every time it rolls around I haven’t even considered that “one year” being this year. I do have a couple of seasonally-appropriate flicks I’ve been holding back for the occasion, though, so in 31 days we’ll see just how horrific my month gets.