July 2012

This month: how I’m doing (as usual), and a little something of interest courtesy of the BFI. (Or should that be a something of little interest?)


Comparisons

I think it’s fair to say that, after a few poorer months recently, July has gone pretty well. In total I watched 16 reviewed films, although as five of those were my Batman retrospective and one was a different version of M (2010’s #20), only 10 actually count towards my total. Still, that’s as good as May and June put together and my best month since March — and when you include the Batmans and M, it’s my best month of the year so far!

So I’m pretty happy with that, it must be said. Especially so as it comes as a bit of a surprise — ‘busy’ months normally feel it, but this one has really crept up on me.


July’s films
Batman Returns
#52 Detective Dee and the Mystery of the Phantom Flame, aka Di Renjie (2010)
#53 Green Lantern: Extended Cut (2011)
#54 16 Blocks (2006)
#54a Batman (1989)
Mask of the Phantasm#54b Batman Returns (1992)
#55 Passchendaele (2008)
#56 Cowboys & Aliens: Extended Director’s Cut (2011)
#56a Batman Forever (1995)
#56b Batman & Robin (1997)
#56c Batman Begins (2005)
The Dark Knight Rises#57 Batman: Mask of the Phantasm (1993)
#58 The Dark Knight Rises (2012)
#58a M (British version) (1931/1932)
#59 The Saint in New York (1938)
#60 The Saint Strikes Back (1939)
#61 The Final Destination (2009)


87 Films in a Year

In my experience, twitter is generally defined by what you happen to see. Unlike a website, where you might log on and peruse posts going back days or even weeks, twitter gives you a snapshot of what everyone’s saying right now.

So I’m glad I happened to see a tweet from the BFI that declared that “2011 saw an average of 87 film viewings per person in the UK”. Considering what my blog’s all about, I’m sure it comes as no surprise that I’ve often wondered this. And I must admit, it’s considerably higher than I would’ve expected, which makes me wonder how they arrived at it. After all, they didn’t survey everyone in the country, so who’s likely to be reached by BFI polling? Film fans, of course.

All statistics are of course dubious, and there’s no information on how this was collated. Was it a random sampling of the general population or was it specifically people who found it via the BFI (i.e. film fans)? Is it only at the cinema or at home too? Is it any film or only ones new to them? Were they asked to guess or were they asked to keep a thorough record? Were they even asked to guess at all or is it somehow derived from box office admissions?

The penultimate one is especially likely to throw the whole affair (so’s the last one, but we’ll ignore that for now because it makes the whole exercise pointless). People often wildly over- and under-estimate, especially when it comes to how many times they’ve watched something. Perhaps that would mean it averages out OK, or perhaps it skews higher. “Oh, I must’ve watched 100 films this year, easy”, when really they watched one every a week.

And if it is derived from people who kept a thorough record, that brings us back to the point that they must be dedicated film viewers — what regular person is going to count up what they watch now and then for an entire year?

Hm. This statistic started out as really interesting to me, but with all of this logic and analysis I think I’ve ruined it. Maybe that’s for the best.


Next time on the all-new 100 Films in a Year monthly update…

I’ve been watching a surprising amount of the Olympics over the past few days. With it set to continue for about the first half of August, will that be a problem for my continued film viewing?

I’ll let you know… in a month. Enforced tension to maximum!

Wallander: Before the Frost and other stories

Tonight sees the finale of the third series of British Wallander adaptations, this one based on the novel Before the Frost. It was previously filmed seven years ago, as the theatrically-released first episode of the Krister Henriksson-starring Swedish Wallander series, and I reviewed it as part of 100 Films 2009, back when BBC Four aired the Henriksson Wallander, creating the vanguard of our current obsession with Scandinavian crime drama (without this, no The Killing! Guardian readers everywhere gasp at the horror of such an imagining). The broadcast of the English-language re-adaptation seemed like a good time to bring my review over here.

The Henriksson series ran for a total of 26 feature-length episodes. They’re mostly very good and I’d recommend them (they’re available in the UK across four DVD box sets from Arrow). After Before the Frost, three further episodes were treated to a theatrical release, so naturally I reviewed them too. Links to all four follow…




The Dark Knight Rises: Initial Thoughts

The Dark Knight RisesEveryone and their mother will be writing about The Dark Knight Rises over the next few days — I’m sure there’s already been an explosion in articles, blog posts and comments on both, not to mention various related terms trending on twitter almost constantly for most of the week already — so I figured I may as well add my voice to all the thousands shouting into the dark. But rather than a full review (which I’ll save for when things have quietened down a little, and perhaps there’s some kind of consensus or even just other reactions to respond too), here’s a couple of stray thoughts and paragraphs that immediately struck me.

Naturally, this is all spoiler free.

Christopher Nolan’s film is properly epic, and a proper trilogy-closer too. We’re so used to superhero stories that never end that even when he said this would be an ending I half expected something spectacularly open-ended. But no, this is as much a fullstop as we’re ever likely to see on a big-screen superhero… unless it proves really popular and they all start doing it, of course. It feels really weird, but only because it’s not something we’re used to.

The epic part has its pros and its cons. It creates a grand close to the trilogy, but it’s a very busy film and arguably the makers bit off more than they could chew. There’s probably enough story and characters for two whole films here, and maybe they should have pulled back a bit on some threads. Equally, that sense of scale creates the uniquely epic sensation, and maybe it will reward repeated viewings and more leisurely contemplation, each apparently-short moment loaded with information. Or perhaps not — it is literally something only time can tell.

There’s been some backlash already, and though I’ve only skimmed it the feeling I get is mostly one of mismanaged expectations, rather than flaws of the film itself. It’s definitely more comic book-y than The Dark Knight, but only about as much so as Batman Begins. That has clearly disappointed some, but may delight others, and not bother others still. The marketing is part of the problem: the final trailer’s slow, measured, elegiacal style suggested Superhero Movie As Art, whereas Nolan has instead delivered a proper summer blockbuster — albeit one with a more measured pace and less frenetic action than usual. It’s more ‘traditional’ in that respect — I’d wager the pacing is similar to a blockbuster of 20 years ago, rather than the non-stop-bombast we get today.

I also think it might have benefited from a title change — the fan-mooted Gotham City seems ever so apt. Perhaps that would have aligned some expectations in the right direction. Ultimately, you see, this isn’t A Batman Film for the people who want that — it’s The Conclusion Of Christopher Nolan’s Bruce Wayne Story. And I think that’s fine, but perhaps you need to expect that, or at least be open to it as a possibility.

Stray thoughts:

On BD I may watch it with subtitles, not just for Bane (one review I read noted that some of Gordon’s lines “seem to get lost in his moustache”, which is an amusing way of putting the fact that half the cast offer muffled lines at some point; could just be cinema sound systems though).

Criticism of Nolan’s action direction, which has gone on since Begins, is increasingly unwarranted. Some may feel there isn’t enough action, or that what we get doesn’t go on in enough detail, but that’s the style of these films — they’re story movies with action sequences, not Action Movies. The previous two were the same. But the actual shooting and cutting of the action we do get is never less than fine.

Related to the epic-ness, I’ve seen numerous complaints of poor pacing or a slow middle. I didn’t feel that once. Similarly, this epic-ness may be why it can feel certain cast members are underused. The one that surprises me is Matthew Modine — is he really a big enough name for his supporting role here to be labelled “underused”? I didn’t think so. The stand out for me was Michael Caine, who may bring a tear to your eye, but there are several other noteworthy performances.

This is why I’m going to write a full review later, though this has already turned out a tad long.

The big question on everyone’s lips has always been, can it equal or better The Dark Knight? I don’t think it does. I didn’t ever really think it could, so perhaps I just correctly managed my expectations in that regard. But it not being as good as one of the greatest action-thrillers ever made doesn’t mean it isn’t a fantastic film in its own right, and it has a tone and a feel that’s both connected to the previous two Nolan Bat-pics and distinctly its own.

I think it’s wonderful stuff.


My ‘official’ drabble-length review can now be read here.

Batman @ 100 Films

You may have noticed that a little film by the name of The Dark Knight Rises is out this Friday. (Believe it or not, I was going to see it on release day. The possibility of that is now looking less certain, sadly. Fingers crossed this doesn’t turn into another Avengers…) In some kind of celebration of this I’ve decided to bring over all my Batman-related reviews to the new blog. (I imagine I’ll keep referring to this as “the new blog” until all the reviews are moved over. So a couple more years, then.)

And then on Friday itself I’ll offer a quick overview of some thoughts on the other live-action Batman films, which I’ve been re-watching. There’ll also be my first thoughts on TDKR, if I see it — gotta get my opinion on to the internet quickly, I’m sure there won’t be thousands of other people doing that.

So expect the following links to go live, in this order, at some point over the next few days…





(And the other live-action films will have their own special new post on Friday too.)

June 2012

It’s officially the halfway point of the year. How are things going?


Fine.

Yeah — another month over, and another that hasn’t gone as well as it might. From the 10-film lead I’d built up by the end of March, I’m now crushingly only just ahead of target. Still, it’s not my worst year ever: I’d only reached 45 at this point in 2008, and 38 in 2009. (For what it’s worth, the best is last year’s 67.)

Despite the end of June ostensibly being halfway through the year, I’d actually be on target with only 49: thanks to February and August breaking the pattern of month-lengths, the halfway-point in days actually falls just inside July (even in a leap year). But that’s swings and roundabouts; and besides, the way I go about things, it pays more to look at the year in terms of months rather than days.


The Lost WeekendJune’s films

#47 Bad Day at Black Rock (1955)
#48 The Beast Stalker, aka Ching yan (2008)
#49 The Spiral Staircase (2000)
#50 The Lost Weekend (1945)
#50a Toy Story Toons: Hawaiian Vacation (2011)
#51 Cars 2 (2011)


John Carter

I was going to watch John Carter and review it tomorrow. Life got in the way. The story’s the same for so many other things I’ve intended to watch recently (it took me a week longer than intended to watch The Lost Weekend, a rare success story). Will try to watch it soon regardless. I’m very curious.


Next time on the all-new 100 Films in a Year monthly update…

Most years at this point I’m quite far ahead. Of the two where I wasn’t, one just scraped 100, the other was my only failure to date.

No pressure to get things back on track, July!

Apologies to my email subscribers

Aside

Apologies to everyone who has subscribed to this blog for the flood of post notification emails that follow this one. I appreciate you signing up to follow me and have tried not to inundate you with this kind of thing — I still have the best part of 600 posts to bring over from my old blog, and have yet to find a way to add an old post without it sending out a corresponding email. If you happen to know of one, please let me know somehow — comment on this post, perhaps.

Thanks for your patience.

May 2012

May has proven to be a tough month, for various reasons. None of them directly relating to my film viewing (though writing off my car fully put paid to belated plans to see The Avengers; it’s a definite BD watch now), but they’ve just generally got in the way.

So May becomes this year’s low viewing month, with just five new films watched. Could be worse, and at least I remain a few films ahead of target (five, to be precise).

And I think I posted more reviews this month than I have for a while, so that’s good too… even if it was only seven. Oh dear.


May’s filmsThe Scarlet Claw

#42 The Return of the Musketeers (1989)
#43 The Negotiator (1998)
#44 Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows (2011)
#45 Scre4m (2011)
#46 The Scarlet Claw (1944)


Next time on the all-new 100 Films in a Year monthly update…

Just four more films in June would see me stay on track, but hopefully next month will pan out a little better than that and I’ll remain ahead. I’ll let you know in 30 days…

How the Avengers assembled

With The Avengers hitting multiplexes Stateside this weekend, having already spent nearly a fortnight breaking or challenging various records around the rest of the world, and with me not having seen it or written my Thor review yet, I figured now was a good time to bring over the reviews from my old blog that cover the films leading up to it.

Plus Ang Lee’s Hulk into the bargain.

So follow these links for my thoughts on…

Hulk
Hulk

The Incredible Hulk
The Incredible Hulk

Iron Man
Iron Man

Iron Man 2
Iron Man 2

And let’s not forget the first Avenger, Captain America, whose film I reviewed the other day.

And I’ll have my Thor review up as soon as I get round to it too.

And I really ought to go see Avengers Assemble

April 2012

33.3% through 2012…


41% through 100 films

Another month over with not many reviews posted. That backlog is getting quite ridiculous now. No significant strategy for getting caught up with it, I’m afraid to say, other than that I do aim to tackle it. Plus the leftovers from last year! Some may need a re-watch; alternatively, I may attempt another Ip Man-style summary.

Viewing progresses well though. Not as many new titles as previous months — down to seven features versus 10, 13 and 11 from previous months — but as #41 is the target for the end of May, I’m happy.


April’s films

#35 Repo Chick (2009)Repo Chick
#36 Chatroom (2010)
#37 Thor (2011)
#37a Marvel One-Shot: The Consultant (2011)
Thor#38 Captain America: The First Avenger (2011)
#38a Marvel One-Shot: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Thor’s Hammer (2011)
#39 Drive Angry (2011)
#40 Special (2006)
#41 Conan the Barbarian (2011)


Catching up on 2011

Recent weeks seem to have seen a fresh inundation of 2011 releases hitting home entertainment formats — The Adventures of Tintin, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo and Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol are all among my purchases this month, with The Artist, Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows, War Horse and more imminent. That’s not to mention stuff released earlier that I’ve still not got round to, like Cowboys & Aliens, Green Lantern, Rise of the Planet of the Apes and Transformers: Dark of the Moon (not that I’ve deigned to buy all of those). As the 2012 blockbuster season officially kicks off (I think we can call The Avengers‘ already-happened international debut & forthcoming US release that), it’s about time I performed my usual trick of catching up on last year’s big hitters.


Next time on the all-new 100 Films in a Year monthly update…

Goodness knows. But some of the above, I should imagine. And I haven’t even mentioned all the exciting catalogue releases that have been happening recently!

March 2012

2012 is one-third done already. Honestly, where does the time go?


March madness?

March hasn’t gone quite as well as previous months, with 11 films watched. Nonetheless, 11 isn’t bad at all — the average needed to reach 100 by the end of December is just eight, and I ‘only’ watched 10 in January, and with a boost of 13 from February I’m still well ahead of target (which, for the end of March, is 24).

Things feel worse than they are because I haven’t really been writing or posting reviews. Just five all month, in fact, which has left me with a quite extraordinary backlog of 36. And to think, the reason I started that “coming soon” page was because I’d reached a ludicrously high number of unposted reviews, and that number was 10. Shame on me, etc.


March’s films

#24 Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003)Master and Commander
#25 The Lady Eve (1941)
#26 The Other Guys (2010)
#27 Stepping Out (1991)
#28 2 Fast 2 Furious (2003)The Court Jester
#29 The Court Jester (1956)
#30 Serpico (1973)
#31 The Last Airbender (2010)
#32 Rules of Engagement (2000)
#33 Megamind (2010)
#34 Despicable Me (2010)


Next time on the all-new 100 Films in a Year monthly update…

Every last one of those is courtesy of Sky Movies, the lingering after-effect of the Oscars. That’s gone now though (I think), so it’s time to start work on my DVD/BD pile and LOVEFiLM’s whims. I should start (as mentioned last month(!)) with those Marvel films I’ve not watched. Other than that, I make no promises. And it would be foolish of me to even promise them, based on my track record.