Supervillain Showdown!

Despicable MeMegamind

vs.

2010 saw the release of two apparently-similar animated films, both dealing with the superhero genre from the perspective of the supervillain. As it turns out only one really does that (Despicable Me features a supervillain, but not in a world of superheroes), but still, it seems a reasonable point of comparison.

I watched them back-to-back back in March, which wasn’t necessarily a revealing exercise but certainly made for a direct comparison. I’ve made some points about that within the reviews themselves, so I shan’t say more here. As ever, click through to read my thoughts:


After that, it should be pretty clear who I think the winner is.

George Sanders as the Falcon

Fearing the cost of renewing the rights to their popular B-movie hero The Saint, RKO acquired a short detective story by Michael Arlen called Gay Falcon and set about bringing it to the screen.

Gay LaurenceThey renamed Gay Falcon’s hero, Gay Falcon, to Gay Lawrence (well, Gay Laurence at first, but I don’t think that really matters), moved his previous surname to be a reasonless Saint-like nickname, and in the lead role cast “Russian-born English film and television actor, singer-songwriter, music composer, and author” (and, later, voice of Shere Khan in Disney’s Jungle Book), George Sanders, the incumbent Saint. RKO had crafted a new franchise that was so like the Saint — but, presumably, cheaper — that Leslie Charteris sued (it was settled out of court).

Sanders stuck around for the first handful of Falcon films before he decided to leave the role. But I’m getting ahead of myself — let’s first look at the three films that established this Saint-but-not…



August 2012

The name’s Templar — Gay Templar.

No, wait…


A two-note month

This month’s viewing has been dominated by two things: on the one hand, sport — much to my surprise, I got very involved in the Olympics (and, currently, the Paralympics); and on the other, ’40s series B-movies from RKO. After taking in the first two Saint movies last month, I continued through the remaining six, and then straight on to the similar Falcon series, which I’m currently almost halfway through.

It makes for a pretty successful month in terms of my overall goal. Watching twelve features, on top of July’s ten, means that I’ve moved from 16 off last year’s pace (at the end of June) to only four behind. September 2011 was a weak month (just four films), so when I surge on with the Falcon after the sport ends, I should be well on my way.


August’s films

The Saint in London#62 The Saint in London (1939)
#62a Dirty Laundry (2012)
#63 The Saint’s Double Trouble (1940)
#64 The Saint Takes Over (1940)
#65 The Saint in Palm Springs (1941)
#66 The Saint’s Vacation (1941)
The Falcon in Danger#67 The Saint Meets the Tiger (1943)
#68 The Gay Falcon (1941)
#69 A Date with the Falcon (1942)
#70 The Falcon Takes Over (1942)
#71 The Falcon’s Brother (1942)
#72 The Falcon Strikes Back (1943)
#73 The Falcon in Danger (1943)


Next time on the all-new 100 Films in a Year monthly update…

Even more of the Falcon — there’s another seven left yet — but hopefully some other films too!

As I noted, last year’s September was poor, so I could well see myself pushing ahead. #100 in November? Well, let’s not get ahead of ourselves.

Make/Remake: The Spiral Staircases

The Spiral Staircase 1945The Spiral Staircase 2000

The Spiral Staircase (1945)

and

The Spiral Staircase (2000)


The Spiral Staircase started life as a 1933 novel titled Some Must Watch. Written by Ethel Lina White (who’s perhaps most notable for having also penned The Wheel Spins which became Hitchcock’s The Lady Vanishes), Some Must Watch is set on the Welsh border in the then-present day. In response to a recent spate of murders, the residents of a Victorian mansion are locked in one dark and stormy night — but is the killer among them?

Both of these adaptations keep the basic story of Some Must Watch, though one updates it to turn-of-the-century New England and the other to turn-of-the-millennium… somewhere (it was shot in Canada), and the latter adds a massive preamble and romance subplot. And apparently they both add the titular staircase. I’ve never read the novel so can’t comment on either of these as adaptations, but in comparison to each other one is vastly superior. The ’40s film is an atmospheric Gothic-noir treat, while the ’00s remake is a cheap TV movie that aspires to be little more than trashy romance welded on TV-friendly ’90s slasher movie. Risible.

For my full thoughts on each, please click through:


The good one is on BBC Two tomorrow, Friday 31st August, at 12:50pm. Record it and watch it on a dark and stormy night.

Hugh Sinclair as The Saint

In the ’30s and ’40s, RKO adapted Leslie Charteris’ series of novels about a modern-day Robin Hood called the Saint into a series of eight films. Following the departure of George Sanders for the similar Falcon series (of which more soon), the mantle of the Saint was adopted by English actor Hugh Sinclair. He may have had the look of a quasi-aristocratic man of action, but Sinclair was no match for the actors that went before, though it apparently wasn’t his fault the series fizzled to an end so quickly.

He ultimately appeared in just two Saint films, which I have naturally reviewed here:


Three Colour TV

Sky Arts 1 are showing Krzysztof Kieslowski’s Three Colours Trilogy over the next few weeks, starting tonight with Three Colours: Blue at 11pm (I believe it’s also repeated later in the week). My ‘reviews’ from back in the blog’s first year aren’t really up to much, but now seemed as good a time as any to bring them over.

This is a set of films I really need to re-watch (and perhaps then re-review), preferably with some kind of academic extras to put them in context. I believe Criterion’s Blu-ray box set is pretty stacked in that department, but at at least £40 it’s a tad rich for my pocket when I do already have them on DVD. (That said, it’s less than I initially thought and only about a tenner more than the UK set, so it’s not so bad really. But as anyone who follows BD releases knows, this September/October is a spectacularly busy one.)

Anyway, here’s the little I had to say in 2007…



George Sanders as The Saint, Part II

In the ’30s and ’40s, RKO adapted Leslie Charteris’ series of novels about a modern-day Robin Hood called the Saint into a series of eight films — you may recall I reviewed the first last month. Five of these films starred “Russian-born English film and television actor, singer-songwriter, music composer, and author” (and, later, voice of Shere Khan in Disney’s Jungle Book), George Sanders.

If that sounds familiar, it’s because I wrote the same thing yesterday. What’s different, naturally, are the reviews: here the final three films to star Mr Sanders as Mr Templar. So without further ado…



George Sanders as The Saint, Part I

In the ’30s and ’40s, RKO adapted Leslie Charteris’ series of novels about a modern-day Robin Hood called the Saint into a series of eight films — you may recall I reviewed the first last month. Five of these films starred “Russian-born English film and television actor, singer-songwriter, music composer, and author” (and, later, voice of Shere Khan in Disney’s Jungle Book), George Sanders.

Being the kind of completist I am, I’ve naturally watched all of these films (also because they’re entertaining and were all on TV at once); and, being massively behind on posting reviews as I am, I thought I’d share my thoughts on them in two or three clumps. The five Sanders films were produced in a period of under two years (from March 1939’s The Saint Strikes Back to January 1941’s The Saint in Palm Springs), so it doesn’t feel wholly inappropriate.

As ever, my thoughts lie behind these pretty pictures…


The Hitchcock 4

It looks like 2012 might be about to turn into a banner year for Alfred Hitchcock.

The BFI have recently completed their project to restore his nine surviving silent films; thirteen of his US works are about to make their Blu-ray debut in October’s massive box set; and Vertigo has just been crowned The Greatest Film Of All Time in Sight & Sound‘s definitive decennial canonisation process.

So broadly in that spirit, today I’ve brought my four previous Hitchcock reviews over to this new blog. I have an awful lot more of his films on DVD that I really ought to get round to seeing… but with that new BD set on the horizon, the compromised comparable DVD set (I think all of the films are even cropped to 4:3) doesn’t look such a tasty proposition. But then the chances of my upgrading to such an expensive BD set don’t look too bright either…

Anyway, that’s a thought process for another time and place. Here’s some old reviews: