A Clockwork Orange (1971)

2015 #152
Stanley Kubrick | 137 mins | Blu-ray | 1.66:1 | UK & USA / English | 18 / R

Yet more dystopian sci-fi! Who doesn’t love some dystopian sci-fi? Here we’re in the ’70s, though (makes a change from the ’80s), with writer-director Stanley Kubrick adapting Anthony Burgess’ novel into a film so controversially violent the director himself eventually banned it from release in the UK for decades. Almost 45 years on, it’s testament to the film’s power that it is still in parts shocking.

Set in a glum future Britain, the film follows eloquent juvenile delinquent Alex (Malcolm McDowell), whose violent acts eventually catch up with him when he’s imprisoned. Being the cocky little so-and-so that he is, he manages to get himself on a programme for rehabilitation and release… though that may not be all it’s cracked up to be.

The first half-hour or so of A Clockwork Orange is brilliant. I think there’s a reason this is the part that the majority of clips used when discussing the movie are lifted from, and it’s not just to do with spoilers: here is where the best imagery, and the most potent examinations of violence and the male group psyche, are to be found. It’s shocking and uncomfortable at times, funny and almost attractive at others (hence the perceived need for the ‘ban’), but the cumulative effect is precise and striking.

However, everything from Alex’s admission to prison onwards could do with tightening, in my view. It may be sacrilege to say this, but I think the film would benefit from having a good 15 to 20 minutes chopped out. All the prison bureaucracy stuff is funny, but is it relevant? “Relevance” isn’t the only deciding factor about what goes into a film, of course, but I feel like we’ve seen plenty of red-tape spoofing elsewhere. Maybe that’s just an unfortunate byproduct of the film’s age. Other parts just go on a bit too long for my taste — there’s barely a sequence after Alex’s arrest that I didn’t feel would benefit from getting a wriggle on. I don’t think this is me bringing a youth-of-today “everything must be fast cut” perspective to the film, I just found it needlessly languorous at times. Maybe I was missing a point.

McDowell’s performance is fantastic throughout. I’ve seen Alex referred to as a villain (not often, but by at least one person), which strikes me (and, I’m sure, many others) as remarkably reductionist and point-missing. He’s not a hero, certainly — a mistake I think some critics of the film made, in part because the use of voiceover invites us to identify with him, and I guess anyone other than the hero having a voiceover narration was fairly new 45 years ago (feel free to correct me on that point). But he’s not a villain, especially when he comes up against the terrifying forces of the establishment. McDowell’s performance, and Kubrick/Burgess’ storytelling, is thankfully more complex than that.

That continues right through to the ending, which is quite different in the novel and film — though I say this as someone who’s not read the book, so apologies if this is off base. Reportedly Burgess ends with Alex moving away from violence of his own free will, primarily because he’s grown up and grown out of it; the point basically being that all young men go through a violent phase (even if Alex’s is extreme) and then grow out of it. Kubrick ends on a much more ambiguous note… so ambiguous, I’m not really sure what it’s saying… or even what all the ambiguities actually are…

A Clockwork Orange remains a striking film, and not just because of the ultra-violence. It’s at its best early on, with the remainder not always working for me, but it’s a fascinating experience nonetheless.

4 out of 5

A Clockwork Orange was viewed as part of my What Do You Mean You Haven’t Seen…? 2015 project, which you can read more about here.

This review is part of the 100 Films Advent Calendar 2015. Read more here.

2 thoughts on “A Clockwork Orange (1971)

  1. Pacing is a funny thing. As films get faster do older films seem slower? Well, Kubricks films were always at his own pace, look at Barry Lyndon or 2001, the grandaddy of glacial pacing. I think I prefer the slower pace of older films. You can dwell on what you are seeing and its nice to, well, let yourself soak in a movie sometimes. I think most modern films are only fast-cut to hide the plot holes and continuity errors anyway.

    Haven’t seen Clockwork Orange for quite a few years. One of those films -like Kubricks The Shining- that I mean to watch again but somehow never get around to. So many films/tv series/books so little time, you know?

    One other point, I caught Clockwork Orange on R1 Dvd, long after its original release. Its one of those films, like 2001 I guess, where its hard to get in your head the impact the film must have had at the time of its original release. Its very good and yes awfully dark and impressive, but the average pg13 action flick is more violent now. Cartoon violence yes but its indicative of how things have changed. And kids watch this stuff now, on home video etc, wheras in Clockwork Oranges day, such things were reserved for the cinema. Kubrick back then would have been horrified at how things have changed.

    Liked by 1 person

    • It’s kind of tricky to explain my issue with its pace, because I didn’t think it was slow exactly, just… unbalanced, maybe. Might well be the kind of thing re-watching would iron out.

      It’s an interesting point about violence. It’s hard to assess its impact, because you’re right that today’s stuff is cartoonish — its empty, choreographed, like a dance routine but with punches. In Clockwork Orange it’s meaningful, presented as something to do for fun if you’re young. I don’t think young people necessarily analyse the meaning of the violence they’re watching that much, but I do think it affects how it goes in.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.