January’s Failures

Welcome to my monthly “Failures” column, where I look back at some of the films I could, would, maybe even should have watched last month… but failed to.

Obviously, the real failure this January lay in not watching very many films of any kind at all; not least things like Blindspot and WDYMYHS, for which I’m supposed to watch one a month, every month. Still, rather than dwell on that, let’s look at what hit cinemas: as usual for January, a trickle of 2025 releases still making their way to the UK, and 2026 newcomers making their flashy debut. The former was headlined by major awards season contender Hamnet, while the latter included horror sequel-cum-fourquel 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple and poorly-reviewed AI sci-fi Mercy.

A lot of other titles seemed to focus on bringing true stories to the screen: Steve Coogan-starring football drama Saipan (not my cup of tea at all, but it had a wide release so I feel I should mention it); unlikely John Bishop-inspired non-biopic Is This Thing On? (as I understand it, it’s ‘based on’ his life story rather than claiming to be it); Hugh Jackman and Kate Hudson as a Neil Diamond tribute band in Song Sung Blue; and more sport with the story of boxer Naseem Hamed in Giant. We also seem to get horror moves year-round nowadays, and as well as the 28 Years Later sequel, January gave us video game adaptation Return to Silent Hill… oh, look, I’m even less likely to watch the others, so why mention them?

Over on the streamers, attempts were made to leverage star power by both Netflix — The Rip, starring Ben Affleck and Matt Damon — and Prime Video — The Wrecking Crew, starring Dave Bautista and Jason Momoa (presented by Hyundai, as the advert on my Fire Stick practically screams. I like the idea I’ll buy something as expensive as a car just because it’s slapped its name on a movie, but hey, that’s always been an oddity of sponsorship).

Elsewise in terms of vaguely brand-new stuff, it was theatrical releases of varying degrees of significance making their subscription streaming debuts and/or moving to a new streamer (I can never remember what’s what for some relatively-new titles). The frontrunner for these was, as ever, Sky Cinema / NOW offering 28 Years Later (perfect timing), The Ballad of Wallis Island, Nuremberg, and a bunch of new versions of IPs — again, of varying degrees of significance; everything from the well-received Liam Neeson-starring The Naked Gun to The Toxic Avenger via another attempt at Smurfs (or, as many of the posters would seem to have it, Rihanna is Smurfette: Smurfs). In a similar ballpark was TRON: Ares on Disney+ and Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire on Netflix, though the latter also gained Stephen King adaptation The Life of Chuck and Diablo Cody (remember her?) scripted Lisa Frankenstein. Prime led with John Wick spinoff Ballerina, plus fantasy adventure The Legend of Ochi.

Digging deeper, Amazon somewhat make up for that relatively thin offering by being the only major streamer that sometimes pulling out more interesting back catalogue additions. I mean, can you imagine Netflix plumping for Billy Wilder’s Avanti, Martin Scorsese’s Boxcar Bertha, or Federico Fellini’s La Strada? Sure, they also get bogged down with the likes of Point Break (both versions), Road House (both versions), Paul W.S. Anderson’s take on The Three Musketeers, and minor Guy Ritchie works like Revolver… but variety is the spice of life, or something. Besides, I could go on to list titles like Beasts of the Southern Wild, In Bruges, Paths of Glory, and Requiem for a Dream. They make some of this stuff a pain to find, but if you’re prepared to dig around a bit, Prime Video usually has more of the more surprising offerings, at least from the big-name streamers.

Still the best way to find the most interesting stuff is to turn to physical media. My purchases this month certainly tended more towards the esoteric, with the only high-profile brand-new acquisition being One Battle After Another. My feelings on Paul Thomas Anderson films swing around wildly, so I hope this is more of a Phantom Thread and less of a Punch Drunk Love. That’s not to say my other purchases were incredibly obscure — something like Stanley Kubrick’s Eyes Wide Shut is well known and, nowadays, well regarded, but it’s not the kind of thing you would’ve found selling out local multiplex within the last few months, either.

Any other month, my most ridiculously extravagant purchase would have been All the Anime’s edition of Macross Plus, which — alongside two discs containing, y’know, the film (and its original four-part series version) — boasts a 184-page book, a set of art cards, and a poster, all encased in Laserdisc-size packaging with a price tag to match (though I got it in their Christmas sale). But no, that was overshadowed by Imprint’s edition of Michael Mann’s The Keep, which comes not only with the usual array of ‘premium edition’ pack-ins like a poster, lobby card reproductions, and a book-length ‘booklet’, but also the full first-draft script, the original press kit, and an entire graphic novel adaptation — plus a solid-metal cross. It weights a ton, and cost one too.

And yet the p&p from Australia was free, because I ordered it alongside their lavish-but-not-that-lavish editions of erotic neo-noir The Last Seduction and Hammer’s Twins of Evil. And the aforementioned sale meant Macross Plus arrived accompanied by the trilogy of Patlabor: The Movie, Patlabor 2: The Movie, and WXIII: Patlabor the Movie 3. To finish things off, the latest Masters of Cinema release: a double-bill of titles directed by Kiyoshi Kurosawa, 1999’s Charisma and 2024’s Cloud, which came with… a slipcase and a booklet. Funny how, once upon a time, that used to b enough to feel like a fairly lavish edition.

The 20th Monthly Review of January 2026

Featured

Strictly speaking, this is not the 20th January review — I didn’t start these monthly progress reports until 2010, which was my fourth year, so (factually) this is the 17th column of this nature. But it’s my 20th year, so what the hey!

I don’t know if that will make me more reflective throughout the year, but here’s one thing I’ve already observed: I was just 20 years old when I started this project, and this year I’ll turn 40. There’ll come a point before too long where 100 Films has been a part of my life longer than it hasn’t. I mean… crikey!

(Despite how close that makes it sound, “before too long” is actually the best part of two years away, in December 2027. Yes, I’ve put something in the diary.)

But, for now, it’s all about the past 31 days. Even after 20 years, they’ve set a new standard; broken a record, if you will. Unfortunately, it’s a bad record, and a new low standard. Oh dear…



This month’s viewing towards my yearly challenge

#1 The Greatest Showman (2017) — Rewatch #1
#2 The Crime Is Mine (2023) — Wildcard #1
#3 The Roses (2025) — Failure #1


  • I watched two feature films I’d never seen before in January.
  • Both of them counted towards my 100 Films in a Year Challenge, along with one rewatch.
  • That’s the weakest start to the year in the two-decade history of 100 Films — which is the new-low record I mentioned at the start.
  • As regular readers may remember, the monthly average needed to hit 100 on target is just over eight films per month, so I’m starting the year very much on the back foot.
  • But hey, it’s meant to be a challenge, right?
  • That said, I’m so far behind already that I think there’s a realistic prospect I won’t catch up to target until the final quarter of the year — especially as I suspect February won’t hit eight Challenge films either.
  • But hey, you never know, right?



The 128th Monthly Arbitrary Awards

Favourite Film of the Month
So, there are only two films to choose from this month, which makes this not very much of a contest at all. Arguably it’s a bit ridiculous even doing it. But I still am, obviously. So, I give the edge to The Roses, probably just because its accurate evocation of British manners and humours clicked with me more.

Least Favourite Film of the Month
And that means the loser by default is The Crime Is Mine, which is, y’know, French. But I liked it a lot and would recommend it, so this might be the most “technicality loser” in the 128-month history of the Arbies.


February may be the shortest month of the year, but I hope it winds up with more films.

What Do You Mean You Haven’t Seen All the Best* Sci-fi, Action, Adventure, Mystery, and Thriller Films?

* According to IMDb Voters

What started out as my version of Blindspot (before someone else coined and popularised the term), I nowadays use as a secondary set of twelve films to watch in a year. Whereas Blindspot is focused on some version of quality and/or popularity, WDYMYHS (for short) has some kind of theme.

This year, I was rather coming up short for what that should be. Via some series of connections or other, I ended up at iCheckMovies, which, for those who don’t know it, was sort of like Letterboxd before Letterboxd came along and did a similar thing but better. iCM is still going, for whatever that’s worth, and I still look at it from time to time to see how I’m progressing on various lists. That’s where the inspiration for this year’s grab bag-type WDYMYHS selection came from: a few of my favourite IMDb genre lists that I haven’t yet completed. When combined, the number of films I haven’t seen on the lists for Sci-fi, Action, Adventure, Mystery, and Thriller (which is the order I looked at them in) comes out at exactly… eleven. But one of those is a two-part film that everyone else lists as two films, which brings us to exactly the number I need for WDYMYHS.

I’m happy to admit it’s not my best theme ever, but it’ll do.

So, in alphabetical order, this year’s films are…


The Cremator

The Cremator

Dersu Uzala

Dersu Uzala
Gangs of Wasseypur - Part 1

Gangs of Wasseypur
Part 1

Gangs of Wasseypur
Part 2

Gangs of Wasseypur - Part 2
The Great Escape

The Great Escape

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3
The Handmaiden

The Handmaiden

Infernal Affairs

Infernal Affairs
PK

PK

A Wednesday!

A Wednesday!
White Heat

White Heat

Woman in the Dunes

Woman in the Dunes

A couple of motes of trivia to end on. Both The Great Escape and The Handmaiden were possible films for WDYMYHS 2024, also thanks to IMDb user-voted lists (I was aiming to finish the Top 250, which meant I had 19 films for the 12 slots. I didn’t finish the Top 250, but I did watch 12 films — not including those two, obviously).

There’s also a WDYMYHS repeat in this year’s Blindspot selection: The Royal Tenenbaums was supposed to be watched in 2019, but I fell short that year. There were quite a few films I failed to watch from that set (I listed them in 2020’s Blindspot post), but this is the only one still outstanding. Hopefully, I won’t say the same in 2027…


Blindspot 2026

This is my 14th year doing a version of Blindspot, so perhaps my customary introduction to the concept is totally unnecessary… but just in case there are still people who haven’t heard of it, this is a challenge in which you pick twelve films you’ve never seen but feel you should have (your blindspots) and watch one per month throughout the year.

In chronological order, this year’s films are…


Different from the Others

1910s
Anders als die Andern

1920s
The Phantom Carriage

The Phantom Carriage
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

1930s
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

1940s
Suspicion

Suspicion
Hiroshima Mon Amour

1950s
Hiroshima Mon Amour

1960s
Belle de Jour

Belle de Jour
Sorcerer

1970s
Sorcerer

1980s
Poltergeist

Poltergeist
The Prince of Egypt

1990s
The Prince of Egypt

2000s
The Royal Tenenbaums

The Royal Tenenbaums
The Great Gatsby

2010s
The Great Gatsby

2020s
Poor Things

Poor Things

For many of the previous 13 years, my Blindspot selection process has been tortuously complicated. I don’t think I’ve ever simply picked twelve films I feel like watching (which is how I’ve seen other people make their selection — perfectly reasonably). Instead, I usually compile various “great films” lists, rank and weight them in various imaginative ways, and thus concoct some kind of ranking-of-rankings to generate 12 new picks. I long ago ruled out relying on the same methodology every year, because that way it’s never surprising and never refreshed — I’d just be working down a very long list, year by year.

Last year, I made things a lot simpler: I looked on Letterboxd for the most popular film I’d not seen from each decade since the origin of feature films, and there was my list. I enjoyed that ‘history of cinema’ approach so much, I decided to repeat it this year. But, as I said, I don’t like to just take the next film on any given list, so I mixed it up slightly. By default, the decade search on Letterboxd displays 18 films (three rows of six). So, having filtered it to the ones I’d not seen, I randomised the selection by rolling a d20 (because rolling dice is fun).

If you’re curious, the rolls were as follows…

Decade Roll
1910s 11
1920s 3
1930s 12
1940s 6
1950s 20
1960s 8
1970s 14
1980s 5
1990s 14
2000s 4
2010s 4
2020s 5

“But, hold on a minute,” you might say, “a d20 has 20 sides, and your selection lists only had 18 films — what happened on a 19 or 20?” A perfectly reasonable and well-observed question. And, as you can see, a 20 was indeed rolled. Of course, I’d thought of a solution in advance, because it was likely the situation would arise (there being a 1-in-10 chance of rolling 19 or 20 on a d20, and there being 12 rolls). The solution was… more dice rolls (because rolling dice is fun).

Or, rather, one more roll, as it only happened once. As a 19 or 20 is a high success, I limited it to the top row (i.e. the six most popular films) and rolled a d6*… and on that, I got a 1 — meaning the 1950s is the only decade for which I’m watching the most popular unseen film, i.e. the one I would’ve watched if I had just picked the next film on the list. Which is fine — the point of randomising the choice wasn’t to stop it ever being the next film on the list, just prevent it being definitively and only that.

* (I appreciate that this system would make no sense in a game (why is 1–6 the optimal result but 19 or 20 results in another 1–6?!), but this isn’t a game, it’s a random number generator, so it’s fine.)


The 20th 100 Films in a Year Challenge

For the 20th year in a row, I’m going to attempt to watch 100 films in a year.

Except, as regular readers will know, it’s a bit more complicated than that nowadays. Just watching any old 100 films each year became a matter of course — the “challenge” aspect died off entirely when I was regularly reaching 200+ films for a few years. So, a few years ago, I reimagined it into what is, effectively, a series of smaller, more specific film-watching challenges, which altogether add up to 100 films in a year.

(Alongside this, I also aim to watch ten new films a month, for a total of 120 a year. My lifestyle and habits have changed in the past few years, so that’s also more of a challenge than it once would have been. Indeed, I failed to do it last year. And I’m about 90% sure I’m going to immediately fail it for 2026 by not getting there in January. At least it’ll take any pressure off for the rest of the year.)

This is the fifth iteration of my new-style Challenge, and each year so far I’ve made some changes — removed and added categories; modified the qualification rules within a category; etc. That was part of my conception of this new version: that it wouldn’t stand still; it wouldn’t become something I could learn ‘how’ to do and repeat ad infinitum. However, I’ve settled on a category lineup that I’m so happy with I don’t want to change it… so I’m not going to. That said, there are certain categories (three of the nine, to be precise) that change their theme or makeup every year anyway, meaning an element of changeability does persist.

So, let’s see what that the 100 Films in a Year Challenge involves for its 20th edition…


First, the one rule that applies across all categories: a film can only count once. That might sound obvious, but the categories are not mutually exclusive: I could rewatch a film from a series I’m halfway through that’s in this year’s genre, and thus it could qualify in three categories — but it can only be counted in one of them.

New Films

x12. Any film with a general release date (i.e. not festival screenings, etc) in the UK (i.e. not in the US, nor any other country) between 1st January 2025 and 31st December 2025. Maximum one per month (but rolls over if I fail to watch one).

Rewatches

x12. Any film I’ve seen before (unless it’s already been counted in 2026’s Challenge). Maximum one per month (with rollovers, as above).

Blindspot

x12. Twelve films, specifically chosen and named in advance, that I should have already seen. Meant to be watched one per month, but I typically fail at that and have to play catch up. This year’s twelve will be revealed in a dedicated post tomorrow.

What Do You Mean You Haven’t Seen…?

x12. Similar to Blindspot, these are twelve specifically chosen films meant to be watched one per month, but here my selections are based around a theme. This year’s theme, and the twelve films selected, will be revealed in a dedicated post tomorrow.

Failures

x12. Every month, I list my “failures”: brand-new releases, additions to streamers, and disc purchases that I failed to watch in the previous month. Sometimes I catch up on some of them the next month; often I don’t. Making them a Challenge category helps with this. A maximum of one per month counts. If I miss one, I catch up on that specific month later.

50 Unseen

x10. Any unwatched film from one of my year-end ’50 Unseen’ lists. It’s likely to be dominated by films from 2025’s list as I catch up on what I missed last year, but anything from the previous 19 years is eligible. (If you’re interested, there’s a complete list of candidates here.)

Genre

x10. Any films from within a specified genre — or, arguably, a sub-genre: I’m not focusing on anything broad like “Action” or “Comedy” here, but something relatively specific. Previous choices have included film noir, gialli, poliziotteschi, and martial arts movies. This year, it’s classic 3D — by which I mean, any film originally released in 3D before the current Avatar-initiated era. (Okay, it’s not really a “genre”, but then neither is film noir if you want to get picky about it.)

Series Progression

x10. Any instalment of a film series I’m already watching. If I start a new series, the first film can’t count but any further films can. (If you’re curious, there’s a list of film series I’m in the middle of here. At time of writing, there’s 36.)

Wildcards

x10. Any film that can’t have qualified in another category at any point. For example, I couldn’t watch two brand-new releases in January and count the second one here, or watch ten classic 3D films and then count an eleventh here.


As the year goes on, you can follow my progress on the Challenge Tracker page, and also via my monthly reviews; or there’s always my Letterboxd for the guaranteed most up-to-date status of my film logging.