My name for Blindspot before someone else created Blindspot, “What Do You Mean You Haven’t Seen…?” (WDYMYHS for short) works in the same way: 12 films I should have seen but haven’t, watched one a month throughout the year. (And these, too, contribute to my 100 Films in a Year Challenge.) To differentiate the pair, I now use Blindspot to focus on Great Movies™ I should have seen, whereas WDYMYHS takes a particular ‘theme’ each year. Last year, it was 1986. This year, it’s film noir.

If you’re getting déjà vu, it’s because in 2022 film noir was the theme of my Challenge’s ‘Genre’ category. Why the jump from Genre to WDYMYHS? What makes that different? Well, when it was just a genre I was free to watch any noirs, and so I tended towards ones that were short or to hand, to facilitate easy viewing. That meant I didn’t make significant headway into the many highly-acclaimed noirs I’ve not seen. So, this year’s selection redresses the balance by being a list of some of the most important noirs I’ve never seen.

First, the 12 films I’ve chosen, in alphabetical order. Afterwards, I’ll write a little about how and why I decided these are “important” noirs.

---

---

Normally it’s Blindspot’s selection process that gets very technical while WDYMYHS is a bit more intuitive, but this year it’s the latter that has used various lists in an attempt to define its 12 films. Not that I got insanely technical with it — no need for Excel spreadsheets and formulae here. Instead, I cross-referenced a handful of key lists, and that got me results I was happy enough with.

First, long-time readers of this blog may remember me referencing the book Pocket Essentials: Film Noir at one time or another in the past. It was the first book I bought after my interest in noir was piqued; a small, slim volume that’s mostly made up of a massive list of noir films. It’s still my go-to reference after watching a noir — to see if it’s in there, and see if there’s a rating (you can’t blame the book’s sole author for not having seen them all). Indeed, even though I now own some large and beautiful noir-related books (Taschen’s Film Noir: 100 All-Time Favorites immediately comes to mind, a book I really should spend more time with), Pocket Essentials is the only book I’ve referred to in forming this list. Before beginning that exhaustive list of every noir they could manage, the book highlights seven key titles for analysis. I’ve seen six of them, meaning the seventh — Alfred Hitchcock’s Shadow of a Doubt — went straight into my WDYMYHS selection.

For the remaining 11, I looked to four lists. First up was TSPDT’s 100 Essential Noirs. (On TSPDT’s site, these 100 have been subsumed into the ongoing 1,000 Noir Films project. You can find lists of just the initial 100 on iCheckMovies and Letterboxd.) With a whopping 72 films I’d never seen (thus proving my point that there are many “essential” noirs I still need to see), I made it a requirement that a film had to be on this list to be included.

The next two lists, which I considered equally, were IMDb’s Film-Noir Top 50 and the top 25 noirs of the ‘Czar of Noir’, Eddie Muller. Although both those lists are ranked, I ignored that in favour of which films were on both lists. Despite not having seen 30 films on the IMDb list and 20 on Muller’s, there were, as it turned out, just nine overlaps. They included the #1 film on Muller’s list, In a Lonely Place, but not my highest-ranked unseen film on IMDb’s, 6th placed White Heat; nor, indeed, the film ranked 2nd by Muller, Criss Cross. Funny stuff like that happens when you use multiple lists, which is part of why I do it so often.

Anyway, adding those nine got me to ten. This is where the fourth and final list came in — though it wasn’t a list as such, more using other opinions as a decider. Going back to the 100 Essential Noirs, I sorted it by the ratings of Letterboxd users, and included the top two that weren’t already in. Those were Ace in the Hole (the 2nd highest that I hadn’t seen on both IMDb’s list and by Letterboxd ratings, but not on Muller’s list) and Mildred Pierce. The aforementioned White Heat missed out by one place.

Or maybe it didn’t. Well, I mean, it did; but I also mean, maybe it will still end up included. I say that because, while normally Blindspot and WDYMYHS wouldn’t qualify for wildcards in my 100 Films Challenge (they’re lists of 12 films taking up 12 slots — there aren’t any to be wildcards), this year there sort of are spare films. In the case of Blindspot 2023, because it’s entirely based around the Sight & Sound poll, films from the rest of the list are allowed as wildcards. For WDYMYHS, as being on the 100 Essential Noirs was an entry requirement, I think the rest of that list should be eligible for wildcards. That’s quite a lot of possibilities (60, to be precise), but I probably won’t actually get round to any of them, so hey, why not?

---